PDA

View Full Version : NASA Admitting Existence of Orbs



Blucottoncandy
02-13-2013, 04:23 PM
What is officially known regarding the “Pulsating Orbs of Light” UFO’s! The UK Ministry of Defense has revealed regarding these “Pulsating Orbs of Lights” UFO’s.

Video belows refers to a statement by Space Shuttle Program Manager Mr. Hale.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=z8pQicHl3dk

Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) in the UK Air Defence Region

The Ministry of Defence has released this report in response to a Freedom of Information request and we are pleased to now make it available to a wider audience via the MOD Freedom of Information Publication Scheme. Where indicated information is withheld in accordance with Section 26 (Defence), Section 27 (International Relations) and Section 40 (Personal Information) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-defence/about/publication-scheme

That Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP or UFO) Exist is indisputable. Credited with the ability to hover, land, take off, accelerate to astonishing velocities and vanish. They can reportedly alter their direction of flight suddenly and clearly can exhibit aerodynamics characteristics well beyond those of any known aircraft or missile – either manned or unmanned.

The Conditions for the initial formation and sustaining of what are apparently buoyant charged masses (of Plasma), which can form, separate, merge, hover, climb, dive, and accelerate are not completely understood.

Dependent on a color’s temperature and aerosol density, it may be seen visually, either by it self generated plasma color, by reflected light, or silhouette by light blockage and background contrast.

Occasionally and perhaps exceptionally, it seems a field with, undetermined characteristics can exist between certain charged buoyant objects in loose formation, the intervening space between them forms an area, viewed as a shape, often Triangular, from which the reflection of light does not occur. This is a key finding in the attribution of what have frequently been called black “Craft”, often triangular and up to hundreds of feet in length. – The UK Ministry of Defence

Check out this document recently declassified by the UK Ministry Of Defense on Unidentified ]Aerial Phenomenon or UAP’s, or as they are called in the US….UFO’s

http://www.disclosureproject.org/docs/pdf/uap_exec_summary_dec00.pdf

Some qoutes from the above paper…

“The relevance of Plasma and magnetic fields to UAP(UFO) were an unexpected feature of the study”

In So Advising

- It should be stressed that, despite the recent increase in UAP/UFO events, the probobility of encountering a UAP/UFO remainns very low

- No attempt should be made to out-manoeuvre a UAP/UFO during interception

- At higher altitudes, although the UAP/UFO appear to be benign to civil air-traffic, pilots should be advised to not manoeuvre, other than put the object astern if possible.

earthman
02-13-2013, 05:51 PM
Conditioning of the masses. Looks more an more like official first contact will be this year. What will happen to all the UFO researchers when this happenes? Can they all collect Social Security and retire? Lol.

Earthman

Blucottoncandy
02-13-2013, 08:50 PM
with the reorg of the MOD files.... I am having issues locating these documents... can any one help?

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FreedomOfInformation/PublicationScheme/SearchPublicationScheme/UnidentifiedAerialPhenomenauapInTheUkAirDefenceReg ion.htm

IsaacKoi
02-14-2013, 09:30 AM
with the reorg of the MOD files.... I am having issues locating these documents... can any one help?

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FreedomOfInformation/PublicationScheme/SearchPublicationScheme/UnidentifiedAerialPhenomenauapInTheUkAirDefenceReg ion.htm

Hi Blucottoncandy,

That reorganisation is a bit of a pain and you now need to use exactly the right link to access the report. The link below is very similar to the link you used, but includes the date of the snapshot and means that the hyperlinks on this page to each part of the report work:

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121026065214/http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FreedomOfInformation/PublicationScheme/SearchPublicationScheme/UnidentifiedAerialPhenomenauapInTheUkAirDefenceReg ion.htm

Let me know if you have any further problems accessing this report.

As you may know, that report is usually referred to as the Condign Report. I wrote a fairly long item about it a couple of days before its public release on 16 May 2006. That item can be viewed at: http://www.ufoupdateslist.com/2006/may/m14-012.shtml

Blucottoncandy
02-14-2013, 03:34 PM
Thank you Isaac !

I hope everyone here has a chance to read Isaacs review of the Condign report that Issac wrote in 2006. The link to his review in above in a previous post. Let me just say... THAT is how to respond to a report!!!

Isaac, never read your stuff before, but let me tell you.... but from this point forward.... I will

Thanks

earthman
02-14-2013, 03:45 PM
We have the best of the best here. These folks here have some of investigators out there. When you have a question, just post it here and you will get an answer by the best. I still think NASA should have stood behind Edger Mitchell when he came out a few rears ago. That's why I don't trust anything they say anymore.

Earthman

IsaacKoi
02-18-2013, 03:24 PM
Thank you Isaac !

I hope everyone here has a chance to read Isaacs review of the Condign report that Issac wrote in 2006. The link to his review in above in a previous post. Let me just say... THAT is how to respond to a report!!!


Thanks for the kind word Blucottoncandy. I hope to be able to post some material in the near future that will be of interest to members of this forum.