Doc
03-18-2012, 02:06 PM
From Filer's Files #11-2012:
Mars Forest Canopies
Revealed in “The Hidden Truth” Report #188
http://www.listrocket.com/ktml2/user/1241_M837Hca3MN/images/uploads/1241_oamuKCK38ozAhY8MKyt3_files/image019.jpg
"Joseph P. Skipper writes about some evidence on Mars in his book “Hidden Truth", “ I'm going to do the best I can to make sure we're all on the same page with this type of forest top canopy evidence because this evidence is a matter of visually joined patterns of massed individual objects. So I'm starting off with a couple of Earth based conventional tree forest canopy visual examples demonstrating closer aerial views as opposed to the more distant satellite views to make sure we're all familiar with what forest canopies look like. Then further down we'll move into the Mars more distant evidence for this report.
DK Canada: Rainforest - Thomas Marent (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://cn.dk.com/static/cs/cn/11/nf/features/rainforest/gallery15.html&lid=74958&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356)
The above first image demonstrates a forest scene here on [COLOR=navy]Earth with a river running through it. Rare on Earth due to the manipulations of man regarding trees as a useable resource, this is an old growth forest in the Amazon (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://www.amazon.com/&lid=74959&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356) basin. As an old growth forest, note how the forest canopy stretches unbroken for so many miles off into the distance. If left alone for long decades or even centuries with the right conditions, this is what tree forests do. They engulf and dominate everything they can get a foothold on or in. Note that, except for the river, no geological terrain features are visible in this scene for mile after mile as all of the geological terrain has been covered over by the plant life (tree) growth. Even the shore of the river is not visible as the trees competing for space in the sunlight extend out hanging over the river's banks.
Now this is a closer oblique angle aerial view and not a distant satellite straight down view. That means that we can see the individual tree objects better and do a little differentiating as to one tree object from another. If we were to progressively draw the scene back to a more distant satellite straight down view, the evidence would of course get progressively smaller and smaller with less and less individual object detail until finally it would look more like a flattened carpet rather than a forest. That is the visual impact of size scale on evidence of this type.
In such distant straight down satellite views, only the predominantly green color evidence would really tip us off that we were looking at forest and life. Trees and plants produce their own food. Simplistically they absorb nutrients and water from the ground and CO2 from the air and convert it via sunlight and photosynthesis into chlorophyll producing the green color in their limbs and leaves and exhale oxygen into the atmosphere that animal life here on Earth, including us, are so dependent upon.
http://www.listrocket.com/ktml2/user/1241_M837Hca3MN/images/uploads/1241_oamuKCK38ozAhY8MKyt3_files/image015.jpg
Of course the Mars black and white satellite imaging released to us conveniently does not contain this color information. If it did, recognition of forests would be instant and no doubt why it isn't included. Likewise the distances involved with satellite images and their straight down view tends to merge forest detail into a blurry joined mass. Just in case that isn't convenient enough for secrecy agenda goals because the great size of some objects resist this effect, messing with the image resolution to further degrade detail into a blurry mess is an additional bonus.
http://www.dendronautics.org/page2.htm (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://www.dendronautics.org/page2.htm&lid=74960&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356)
The above 2nd image is another example of an aerial Earth Amazonia forest unbroken canopy view.
Note again that no ground geology is visible here at all. The trees engulf and cover everything. Again, this is typical of old growth tree forests that over long periods of time pack every bit of the available finite space in great density as they compete with each other for sunlight essential to their photosynthesis process. Also, over long periods of time, certain types of trees tend to dominate more successfully and the forest becomes more and more homogenous with less and less variety.
You'll note that I have placed two small insets into the upper right corner of the images. The top inset is the whole image desaturated of color and with a reduction in size to just 20% of the original color image to sort of mimic or simulate how the distancing technique impacts detail. The second inset down below the top one is again the whole image desaturated of color, shown on 20% of its original size, and now with just one layer of blur also added. Note how the blur further reduces the detail while yet maintaining the more gross features. This is just one of a number of ways that obfuscation is done in the satellite science data. (continued)
Mars Forest Canopies
Revealed in “The Hidden Truth” Report #188
http://www.listrocket.com/ktml2/user/1241_M837Hca3MN/images/uploads/1241_oamuKCK38ozAhY8MKyt3_files/image019.jpg
"Joseph P. Skipper writes about some evidence on Mars in his book “Hidden Truth", “ I'm going to do the best I can to make sure we're all on the same page with this type of forest top canopy evidence because this evidence is a matter of visually joined patterns of massed individual objects. So I'm starting off with a couple of Earth based conventional tree forest canopy visual examples demonstrating closer aerial views as opposed to the more distant satellite views to make sure we're all familiar with what forest canopies look like. Then further down we'll move into the Mars more distant evidence for this report.
DK Canada: Rainforest - Thomas Marent (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://cn.dk.com/static/cs/cn/11/nf/features/rainforest/gallery15.html&lid=74958&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356)
The above first image demonstrates a forest scene here on [COLOR=navy]Earth with a river running through it. Rare on Earth due to the manipulations of man regarding trees as a useable resource, this is an old growth forest in the Amazon (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://www.amazon.com/&lid=74959&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356) basin. As an old growth forest, note how the forest canopy stretches unbroken for so many miles off into the distance. If left alone for long decades or even centuries with the right conditions, this is what tree forests do. They engulf and dominate everything they can get a foothold on or in. Note that, except for the river, no geological terrain features are visible in this scene for mile after mile as all of the geological terrain has been covered over by the plant life (tree) growth. Even the shore of the river is not visible as the trees competing for space in the sunlight extend out hanging over the river's banks.
Now this is a closer oblique angle aerial view and not a distant satellite straight down view. That means that we can see the individual tree objects better and do a little differentiating as to one tree object from another. If we were to progressively draw the scene back to a more distant satellite straight down view, the evidence would of course get progressively smaller and smaller with less and less individual object detail until finally it would look more like a flattened carpet rather than a forest. That is the visual impact of size scale on evidence of this type.
In such distant straight down satellite views, only the predominantly green color evidence would really tip us off that we were looking at forest and life. Trees and plants produce their own food. Simplistically they absorb nutrients and water from the ground and CO2 from the air and convert it via sunlight and photosynthesis into chlorophyll producing the green color in their limbs and leaves and exhale oxygen into the atmosphere that animal life here on Earth, including us, are so dependent upon.
http://www.listrocket.com/ktml2/user/1241_M837Hca3MN/images/uploads/1241_oamuKCK38ozAhY8MKyt3_files/image015.jpg
Of course the Mars black and white satellite imaging released to us conveniently does not contain this color information. If it did, recognition of forests would be instant and no doubt why it isn't included. Likewise the distances involved with satellite images and their straight down view tends to merge forest detail into a blurry joined mass. Just in case that isn't convenient enough for secrecy agenda goals because the great size of some objects resist this effect, messing with the image resolution to further degrade detail into a blurry mess is an additional bonus.
http://www.dendronautics.org/page2.htm (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://www.dendronautics.org/page2.htm&lid=74960&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356)
The above 2nd image is another example of an aerial Earth Amazonia forest unbroken canopy view.
Note again that no ground geology is visible here at all. The trees engulf and cover everything. Again, this is typical of old growth tree forests that over long periods of time pack every bit of the available finite space in great density as they compete with each other for sunlight essential to their photosynthesis process. Also, over long periods of time, certain types of trees tend to dominate more successfully and the forest becomes more and more homogenous with less and less variety.
You'll note that I have placed two small insets into the upper right corner of the images. The top inset is the whole image desaturated of color and with a reduction in size to just 20% of the original color image to sort of mimic or simulate how the distancing technique impacts detail. The second inset down below the top one is again the whole image desaturated of color, shown on 20% of its original size, and now with just one layer of blur also added. Note how the blur further reduces the detail while yet maintaining the more gross features. This is just one of a number of ways that obfuscation is done in the satellite science data. (continued)