Doc
06-15-2012, 06:23 AM
http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2012/06/aztec-scott-ramsey-and-fred-reed.html
Kevin Randle takes a critical look at the Aztec Crash, a much disputed case that somehow refuses to die.
A Different Perspective (http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/)
A Commentary on UFOs, Paranormal events, and related topics.
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Aztec, Scott Ramsey and Fred Reed
"After my book, Crash – When UFOs Fall from the Sky was published, Scott Ramsey told one radio show host that he wanted to debate with me about the Aztec UFO crash. I declined, but only because I hadn’t read his book so I wasn’t aware of what Ramsey might have learned. I try to keep an open mind, although the Aztec crash seemed to have been proved a hoax more than once long ago.
Since that time, I have seen Ramsey’s book, spoken with him twice, and exchanged emails with him. I didn’t want to review the book because it seemed to be filled with errors, some minor and some egregious. I suggested that it was a fun little book, which it is in a distorted, perverted sort of way, but it is also a dishonest book, leaving out information that would underscore the false nature of the Aztec case."
Kevin Randle takes a critical look at the Aztec Crash, a much disputed case that somehow refuses to die.
A Different Perspective (http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/)
A Commentary on UFOs, Paranormal events, and related topics.
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Aztec, Scott Ramsey and Fred Reed
"After my book, Crash – When UFOs Fall from the Sky was published, Scott Ramsey told one radio show host that he wanted to debate with me about the Aztec UFO crash. I declined, but only because I hadn’t read his book so I wasn’t aware of what Ramsey might have learned. I try to keep an open mind, although the Aztec crash seemed to have been proved a hoax more than once long ago.
Since that time, I have seen Ramsey’s book, spoken with him twice, and exchanged emails with him. I didn’t want to review the book because it seemed to be filled with errors, some minor and some egregious. I suggested that it was a fun little book, which it is in a distorted, perverted sort of way, but it is also a dishonest book, leaving out information that would underscore the false nature of the Aztec case."