Nibiru----?

[epo333]

Maybe this was mentioned in another thread, but here it is ...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ti7_ATtflvo&feature=player_embedded

Maybe some conclusive comments will come forth.

[A99]

Maybe some conclusive comments will come forth.

Ha, ha! Well, you're going to get anything but that from me on this one!

------------------------------------------
If it's not a "lens glare" then what the heck is it? The "Dance of Death" of a rouge planet that's going to ram into Earth to the tune of Wagner 28 days from now? Oh gee, I need an Advil. :cool:

[epo333]

Ha, ha! Well, you're going to get anything but that from me on this one!

Dang, a poor choice of words on my part...:doh:

[A99]

Dang, a poor choice of words on my part...:doh:

No problem Epo. Not all of here are able to make comments on anything under the sun sound like the Magna xxxxxxx Carta. Just suck it in because you're in good company!

[majicbar]

Technically a lens flare occurs between the front glass of the optics and the back glass of those optical elements which make up the "lens", and it is a reflection of a point light source reflecting off one surface and re-reflecting back again into the camera. What I think is happening here is a reflection between the last glass element and the camera's sensor, but this would require that the last element be nearly flat, which is true on some of the camera lenses that I've seen. One would need the actual camera to check to see if this were true.

Were the light actually from Niberu, it would be like the Moon that close to the Sun, unless it were on the other side of the Sun. Were that true however it would clearly be seen by the S.O.H.O. satellite and no such large object has been seen in those images, so this is most likely a camera issue.

[montalk]

I saw a video explaining this effect just last week. Here it is, around 8:15:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFfJh9CnI3c

[CasperParks]

I am not sold on the planet X thing.

There is that photo going around on youtube with planet X allegedly in route, taken somewhere in Antarctica.

If on an approach from the South Pole, perhaps for a time it would be obscured elsewhere.

Given the proximity of time until December 21st 2012, commonsense dictates at point that populated areas in southern hemispheres would have a view of it through telescopes.

It would be nice to hear an expert weigh-in on the matter of approach.

[CasperParks]

The Bible does mention a city in space, often called the New Jerusalem.

City is 1,500 squared. It is not a planet and placed it into another category.

It is possible that a massive city on a small planet takes up the entire surface.

The Bible does state, again this is estimated time. Around what is known at 3,000AD that city in space “lands or rests” on the earth, creating a new heaven and new earth.

Is there a close call looming on the horizon, then it swings around and returns at roughly 3,000AD?

What if it is describing a collision of some-sort?

That would change a lot of things in this solar system...

[Neuru]

@Casper:
On the topic of New Jerusalem being a gigantic cube ship, there was this posted on OM: http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/news/ufo_extraterrestrials/2011/12/13/2204.html
Also this: http://users.belgacom.net/gc674645/heaven/newjerus.htm
Here's a copy of the original thread: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/57087428/Threads/Open%20Minds%20Forum%20-%20gigantic%20Cube.htm

[CasperParks]

@Casper:
On the topic of New Jerusalem being a gigantic cube ship, there was this posted on OM: http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/news/ufo_extraterrestrials/2011/12/13/2204.html
Also this: http://users.belgacom.net/gc674645/heaven/newjerus.htm
Here's a copy of the original thread: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/57087428/Threads/Open%20Minds%20Forum%20-%20gigantic%20Cube.htm

Mention of a borg cube was funny. If real, I doubt it is anything like the borg.

Also, the space city New Jerusalem is likely older than the city of the same name here.

They had another artical.

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/news/headline_news/2012/11/23/4929.html

With a link to this video:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9wFi9wkZlQ&feature=player_embedded#!

A lens or camera malfunction?