• Garuda

    by Published on 11-24-2011 01:55 PM

    I've been involved in alien abduction research since 1994. Over the years I've gained some insights which I think help explain the dynamics in the phenomenon. Below I'll first give the nutshell version of eight of my current ‘working hypotheses' with regard to Alien Abductions. Then, I'll elaborate shortly on each of the items.

    1. Existence of a treaty – The US Government has had contact with extraterrestrial civilizations, and this resulted in a treaty with a consortium of aliens.
    2. Content of the treaty – Part of the treaty was a deal in which technology was exchanged for the right to abduct, on the condition that the people were not harmed, and returned without any memory of the event. Lists of people who had been abducted had to be handed over. Other aspects involve the permission to have bases on US soil, as well as an exchange program.
    3. US Military involvement – Somewhere along the line, it became clear that things went wrong, which resulted in a change in MO, where the USG would be more actively involved in the abductions, in order to make sure that they had some control or at least a clearer view on what was going on. The result of this is that many abductees remember seeing military personnel working together with aliens.
    4. RE-ABS – Apart from this, but for the same reason, i.e. to get a clearer picture of what is going on, the Military abducts abductees and questions them. (MILABS, type 1 – also labelled ‘RE-ABS').
    5. Intruders – They found out that apart from the aliens with whom a treaty was made, other aliens had started engaging in abductions, too, outside of the control of the USG.
    ...
  • Recent Blog Posts

  • Recent Forum Posts

    epo333

    DISCLOSURE Moving Along?

    David Grusch has called out DNI Avril Haines on multiple occasions! Let's learn the significance of this. UFO News is threaded into this video as well.

    epo333 Today, 07:07 PM Go to last post
    Longeyes

    New Whistleblower Jason Sands

    Anyone heard anything about 'Steve' the other whistleblower who seems to have come forward? He's mentioned quite a few times in the discussion but never

    Longeyes Yesterday, 12:15 PM Go to last post
    Longeyes

    New Whistleblower Jason Sands

    But aren't people forgetting the checks he's been through? He seems to be known by all the credible researchers. He sounded genuine to me. The way he's

    Longeyes 04-23-2024, 05:53 PM Go to last post
    epo333

    New Whistleblower Jason Sands

    Seems a lot to sort out here. Bits and pieces of what is already there with little if anything not already known.

    One thing I pick up on

    epo333 04-23-2024, 03:09 PM Go to last post
    Shere Khaan

    New Whistleblower Jason Sands

    So apparently Eric Davis came out saying he was either a liar or believed his own BS. I saw an image capture on reddit but haven't been able to track

    Shere Khaan 04-23-2024, 02:38 PM Go to last post