Sts-61c ufo?: Nasa photographs

[majicbar]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-61-C


Images STS61C--31-2 AND STS61C-31-3


http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseo...ID=STS61C-31-2


Server: 2

This service is provided by the International Space Station program and the JSC Astromaterials Research & Exploration Science Directorate.

Recommended Citation: Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA-Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." <http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseo...ID=STS61C-31-2>01/23/2013 21:44:31.


http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseo...ID=STS61C-31-3


Server: 2

This service is provided by the International Space Station program and the JSC Astromaterials Research & Exploration Science Directorate.

Recommended Citation: Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA-Johnson Space Center. "The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth." <http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseo...ID=STS61C-31-3>01/23/2013 21:48:14.


So as of now there are two images from NASA itself of what would seem to be the TR-3B secret spaceplane in space near the flight of STS61C, or a genuine UFO. NASA, you got some splainin to do!

[earthman]

I just sent the info and link to the video to the BBC to see if they might look into it. That is one hell of a shot. Humm...??? About as clear as the come. Can't wait to see if this make waves somehow.. Thanks Majicbar. You are always on it. Seen your post a AS on it.

earthman

[majicbar]

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sh...s/sts-61C.html

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...1994019586.pdf

This document is the inspection report on the tiles on the orbiter Columbia after landing. Only 7 damages on the bottom exceeded 1 inch, there were 2 on the upper side and 4 on the right OMS Pod (p. 48). Each of these damages would have occurred during launch and would have left the vicinity of the shuttle immediately during the launch. The object in the photographs clearly seems to be much larger than a few inches. The tiles of the Shuttle are only surfaced black on the exposed surface and are white otherwise. It seems totally unlikely that what was photographed was a damaged portion of the tiles from the Shuttle.

http://spacetime.forumotion.com/t990...riangle-object

http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/99/98/32/e706f810.jpg

http://i49.servimg.com/u/f49/16/99/98/32/e706f810.jpg

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread920798/pg1

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread235336/pg1
Topic started on 26-11-2006 @ 09:35 AM by Acharya
This topic was covered on ATS 6 years ago, but stirred no great attention for explanation.

[Doc]

To me it looks like a very large object at a distance, nothing at all like a piece of debris. Has there been any analysis or other discussion of these pictures elsewhere?

[majicbar]

To me it looks like a very large object at a distance, nothing at all like a piece of debris. Has there been any analysis or other discussion of these pictures elsewhere?

Notice ATS links in previous posts, both from current surge of interest and from back in 2006.