I can't deny that point, that is for sure.
Who is the enemy/ally though?
Were keeping me company. I haven't crossed paths in recent days. Doesn't mean they aren't watching every now and then.
Just returning to the forum solicited several checkups before I actually showed up.
The triplets (grey members) should definitely not be trusted at face value. Then again, I would say the same about nordics of various kinds.
Honesty is an individual thing. I am actually surprised they told me alot of the stuff they did. I am surprised when members of this forum or even documentaries make mention of cases and facts/evidence/witnesses that saw or experienced what the ET described many years ago.
I think it is safe to say that we live in a very odd reality...to say the least. The creator must have had a sense of humor or ample creativity when making this our current narrative into a reality. Reality is stranger than fiction.
-----------------------
An easy example:
Montalk recently pointed me to a few links online (one of which I had already seen years ago but not fully understood) that displayed the hindu-esque versions of applied psychic phenomena.
I took the time to really read it thoroughly and mentally replace and compare the ET schemas to theirs and was surprised to see most of the blue prints and designs for psychic phenomena being present in ancient Hindu culture from thousands of years ago. They use somewhat different concepts and paradigms but the whole schema is right there with a different series of names.
Reading it from that perspective I did gain several insights into various points that I don't have any information for or are missing vital specifics on. I am still trying to figure out from those foreign versions to see how valid they are if applied to the ET versions.
So, as the advisor often said when we had conversations, alot of what she is telling me is known somewhere.
It makes me smirk (nicely) when I see confirming evidence that the Advisor was not the first (nor the only one) to give away that kind of information. It also makes me wonder about the other volumes of ET conversations that I never shared on the forum.
Like the wild stories of them spying on secret projects they said never to repeat anywhere else. I am honestly surprised to see such wild stories that I myself thought were 'bunk' and instead were revealed as a reality.
What really disturbs me are the implications of one story being true, that is then somehow related to the next story. If A is true, then what does it mean for B, C and D?
I am more skeptical than people give me credit for. But I am also a captive to being a witness and many times a bystander to see them doing all sorts of things normal people would pound the table furiously and assure me they aren't true.