I'm working two instrumentation problems.
I've been thinking about these problems for awhile now. Unfortunately, I have no place to chat with folks about the problems, I mean with who, where? Where can one go to find others who are interested to instrument ET objects sans the phuking useless camera? The only guys I know of who have instrumented or who are/were, are either deceased or don't consider me to be the 'right-stuff' to chat with, guys like Mark Rodigher(sp?) I've called and written him a dozen times...with no reply.
So far I've found three ET presence books which are of technical quality, beyond that very few books offer anything of technical value, and most everything else is blah blah blah. Two of those authors are deceased and the other, well he speaks German and is hidden behind a barrier, and sides, I don't know what to say to him? I just wanna chat with him as a peer. Kick around a few ideas, compare notes, maybe collaborate on a project...
Here's the problem I'm working. I address this to no one in particular, while it is my hope, I don't actually expect anyone to offer any cogent suggestions, without intending to sound rude, however, to do so requires having actually thought about the matters a bit, and frankly I don't actually see any folks thinking about ET presence problems...so it is very unlikely in my opinion. Hopefully I'll be proven wrong...for a change. I mean about the thinking part. To elicit a cogent informed suggestion requires having actually studied ET object exhibitions from the technical perspective rather than what can be yakked about faked video. I've posted in hundreds of ET vistation website chat-rooms during these past 25 years, with the exception of a few guys such as Bruce Macabee(sp?), and a few others, I have not found anyone who knows anything technical about ET objects, but it seems many are video experts. Maybe I don't elicit replies due to my attitude? Or maybe I got bad-breath?
Ad rem, so here's my current introspection, and drawing upon a few cases cited by Dr. Harley Rutledge (deceased), Frances Ridge, Dr. Mark Rodigher(sp?), Frank Edwards (deceased), Dr. Illobrand von Ludweiger about EM effects and Dr. Paul Hill (deceased) in his (excellent) book ("Unconventional Flying Objects - a scientific analysis) regarding his perceptions of ET mecha acceleration fields. In my current UFO object detection system that I am developing, I have designed a 3 axis, x, y, z Earth-field sensitive 0.1 ~ 100Hz magnetometer. But is it enough? Then there is the matter of the time-anomaly. The only thing Earthian science predicts that can effect or ?distort? time is the presence of 'gravity-waves'. There are reported, strange, anomalies that seem to behave as though created by a moving wave, but instead of just affecting or influencing or perhaps a better description, 'disturbing' electrical/electronic systems, it seems that specific areas of reality is disturbed. Car motors don't just cease to run, as one might expect, such as being disrrupte by a very large magnitude electro-motive field interfering with the electromagnetic motor coil of a fuel-pump, which pumps fuel to the motor, the large ET object field neutralizing the motor coil, thus interrupting the fuel to the motor and in theory, causes it to cease to run as result, or disrupting the motor's high-voltage transformer 'ignition coil' thereby causing the motor to cease its operation. No. The motor just stops, it operation is not disrupted. It coughs, sputters, and stops running. And when the disturbing influence stops, the ET object transits off into the distance, the motor does not require to be restarted, it just sputters back to running!?! The normal 'flow' of REALITY, (in theory) was paused. Capece?
How to detect that? What is it that is being distorted?
Its one thing to note (as reported by Frank Edwards, 'Flying Saucers: Serious Business') navigational dial compass spinning while watching a nearby hovering flying-saucer, -- that can be explained as a large slow moving magnitude electromotive field, and while its not particular easy to measure such a field (and to be able to easily share the data), how does one measure the other anomaly? How does one measure the missing-time events? Of course folks will likely proffer that the so-called 'missing time' is a psychological effect, having been pulled from normal daily life, taken somewhere, fiddled with and then having an abduction screen-memory implantated. But there are other evidence that beg other explanations. The motor event is one such example nothing psychological about that.
So here's my current working thought-theory. I envision a flying-saucer hovering over an area. Its 'propulsive' cone being directed by its moving-vanes (Hill, "Unconventional Flying Objects", ppg 131 ~ 144, and 145 ~ 166), immersing the area below and the Earth surface intersecting cone-area, there is a necessary cone/not-cone area boundary. It is this boundary that is under consideration. As illustrated by Jacques Vallee's representation in Spielberg's, "Close Encounters", where Dreyfus is under the cone's influence, a multi-spectral event, the truck's motor has apparently ceased running, yet when the ET object moves away, the motor just RESUMEs operation. There was a boundary area, and the motor was inside the cone. When the ET object moved, the motor sputtered back into full-run mode, as the motor transitioned between the cone-of-influence to the no-cone-of-influence area, the ET was moving. The question is, can an accelerometer, a sensor that is normally affixed to a movable object, that senses Earth field flux lines moving past it as the accelerometer moves, be used in a static, non-moving position to sense a moving gravity-wave generated by a flying-saucer?
Then, it is known that time-anomalies exist during hovering flying-saucer events. The closer one is to the cone boundary, the less predictably linear time seems to exist. So how could one measure a time-anomaly?
My current working introspection is to implement a 'sensor' to detect a disparity difference between a 'sensor-clock' and a 'reference-clock'. The idea would something like putting a readable real-time clock up in a tree connected to a radio-telemetry-transmitter/receiver which periodically transmits its date-time data to a remotely located date-time receiver, where the two time-clock's data are periodically compared. Occasionaly, the two clocks are re-synchronized to 'calibrate' the date-time clock drift. The two date-time clocks need be separated so that should a flying-saucer be hovering nearby, hopefully the propulsive field cone would not also envelope the radio-tethered remotely located date-time 'sensor' clock. The two clocks, I suspect should be reasonably stable, and they should be near the same quality, so that if one drifts, they both drift similarly at the same rate. The actual date-time is not important. It is the difference, that in theory can be used as a detection signature of a nearby hovering flying-saucer.
Comments are invited
ka-lemtah