Although it is strange that no tile damage was reported. The Hi-Res pictures look more like some kind of debris rather than a craft.
Although it is strange that no tile damage was reported. The Hi-Res pictures look more like some kind of debris rather than a craft.
I agree it looks like debris. I think there is a coverup in place regarding damage to the tiles or other exterior of the shuttle.Originally Posted by ProblemChild
I am almost certain that the detail photo posted here is CGI, the level of detail of the object is detailed to an extent that having studied such photos for fifty years, is out of place. Replacing the original with a CGI creation answers what was seen as NASA would want to shape the discussion. In most instances I would trust NASA sources, but what I see here makes me take sides with those who doubt that NASA will tell the truth when confronting the alien issue.
Why would they CGI a huge tiff file that only a few would bother to download. I'm no image expert but I don't see any cgi.
The image of the tile is too sharp, from the distance that this was imaged there should be much less definition of the edges. NASA releases it's scientific images all in TIFF format, JPEGS are used in the publicity releases. I would imagine that the original background image was in TIFF and therefore to cleanly drop a CGI into the image they would have to do their CGI also in TIFF format to do so.
There are no shuttle tiles that have a 60 degree angle on them, broken or not. The original triangle picture in our atmosphere was a triangle. It wasn't until 'Nasa's Unexplained Files' and the History Channel's 'Hanger 1' that NASA come up with this mega pixl file of a what they called a piece of the shuttle tile that this came out. The were pre-debunking these shows. Search all of the shuttle files and prove me wrong. Ed
NASA's process after landing the shuttle included very careful examination and documentation of each tile on the Shuttle after it's landing. Every tile had a unique ID and it would have been possible for NASA to prove this was a tile of a particular number and show that it was missing upon the shuttles landing. That they did not do this is only further indication that this was a "Blue Book like" bogus explanation for the image. I'd have to check to see if there were any triangular fractures, but the same argument applies, NASA would have photographic evidence upon the Shuttle's landing of such a damaged tile. Another argument against this simply being a tile is that the black surface was a surfacing on a white tile, so a whole tile being lost should still show white under the black and we see only black.
Last edited by majicbar; 10-12-2014 at 12:35 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote