Mr. Johnson...I read the article all the way to the end. I am glad you have put the information out there. I have seen Ed's documents from the military and have even discussed them with him a number of times. I have been in the US Army (see my avatar) and participated from 1971 to 1979 and then USAF active reserve from 1983 to 1986. Looking at his documents I found them to be authentic. During these times we had typewriters and at the battalion level personnel unit we had one electronic typewriter. These electronic typewriters were not PC's with printers...no PC's during this period. Sometimes spacing was off and so were paragraph indention's. I can compare some of Ed's documents to my own as having been done with typewriter or electronic typewriter because of the way in which these instruments performed.Originally Posted by AndrewDJohnson
When I look at the debunkers trying to debunk Ed and his service and his commendations I tend to think "character assassination" but for what reason I do not know. I think the debunkers need to find a real purpose in their research elsewhere, there must be other things out there besides character assassination. Someone does not want the information out there. One of the things I learned in my law enforcement career is that witnesses, prosecutors or even defense lawyers will attack the person to distract if they cannot disprove a story. In Ed's case of the TR3-B or triangles...it cannot be disproved...in the case of the documents and Ed working at Area-51 cannot be disproved. So the next step for a debunker is to attack the person's character. This is also a classic government move and governments do it all the time. I have seen it at work even at lower levels of government. Thank you for the link to your information. It was very revealing.
