Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Space Command: The Command, Control, Communications

  1. #1
    Lead Moderator calikid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Sunny California
    Posts
    10,228
    Blog Entries
    19

    Space Command: The Command, Control, Communications

    A thread requested by our verbose member, Ed Fouche.
    Take it away Ed
    The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but
    progress. -- Joseph Joubert
    Attachment 1008

  2. #2

  3. #3

    History of Space Command

    History of Space Command

    Most people thing the only way we can get into space with two or three stage to orbit vehicles using rockets. That is a total lie. We had space vehicles that could exceed Mach 6+ in the 60s and that's six times the speed of sound.
    We had vehicles back then that could climb in altitude to above 120 thousand feet. In the 70s we had a F-15 fighter aircraft that could fly high enough to shoot down satellites with missiles. Under the Aurora Program we had the SR-74 and SR-75. The Scramp could ride piggy back on the mother ship in a two stage to orbit launch. You will like this link:
    http://www.rense.com/ufo/triangUS.htm



    SPACE COMMAND

    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22h...history+secret

    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22h...m=122&ie=UTF-8

    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...rialtech07.htm

    "I hate to tell you, but these are not the infamous "Black Triangles" that I have seen. The one I saw was like 1000 feet long and like 800 feet wide in a huge isoceles triangle -- totally silent -- flying like 50 mph about 1000 feet up and then taking off to like Mach 20 in 2 seconds and disappearing in the distance at incredibly high speed... not making a sound."

    "Take it for what it's worth....but the some of the first TR3s were used in Gulf War I as support for some of the nighthawks, and vice versa. So, if you heard anyone from desert storm talking about flying triangles....there you go. They seldom flew alone. They almost always has nighthawks with them, and only flew from 2am local until 4:30 or 5am, depending.
    There were a few more exotics used as well...but first things first."

    "It's actually a plasma engine. Plasma can be used as an infinite source of electrical energy, if you can produce and harness it. I heard mercury was an important ingredient. I'm sure it's not mercury though, it's got to be something more than that."

    http://www.godlikeproductions.com/fo...sage643319/pg1


    Also, a “combined industry and government team” at LOCKHEED-MARTIN Skunk Works ( Palmdale, California ) was developing the X-33 for its AeroSpike XRS-2200 engine flight out of Edwards Air Force Base ( California ) scheduled for December of 1999.
    The Linear Aerospike XRS-2200 ( RS-2200 ) engine was developed by the ROCKETDYNE PROPULSION AND POWER UNIT of the BOEING COMPANY indicating they completed the engine in early 2000 although the F-117A Stealth fighter was already secretly flying ‘long before’ their official public information release.
    The difference between the linear AeroSpike engine and conventional rocket engines are the shape of the nozzle – unlike conventional rocket engines using a bell shaped nozzle to constrict expanding gases – the Aerospike nozzle is V-shaped and called a “sramp”.
    http://kentronintellectresearchvault.../tag/decipher/


  4. #4
    You know Edgar I suspect that there is a huge range of prototype air and space craft that is designed to look like UFO shapes. Those UFO shaped craft are then used to do recon during the day to confuse the public and enter air space that is not the USA.

    I think I may have cut through some of the smoke and mirrors.

    What do you think?

  5. #5
    You know Edgar not replying just makes me think I hit the nail on the head

  6. #6
    So it makes me lead to the following speculation. The UFO flaps after WWII to the 70s were most probably prototype aircraft of the disk and spinning top design and why we hardly see them today. So the 80s was the start of the TR-3B/Aurora to replace the Blackbird spy plane but added with the near zero gravity that was developed with the disk design.

    So Foo Fighters/Glowing Orb seen during WW1 and WW2 are clearly ETs

  7. #7
    3c61_1.jpg
    janet airlines

    av-2654.jpg
    interesting aerodynamics

    148030main_bwb_boeing_hi.jpg
    Boeing @ Langley air tunnel

    050418_ascender_hlarge.jpg
    a v-lift

    dsc_0081.jpg
    the sr-71 piggyback drone

    a few interesting pics for you
    sit on the edge to watch something unfold with a force we cannot control but communicate with

  8. #8
    not-sr71.jpg
    not sr-71
    sit on the edge to watch something unfold with a force we cannot control but communicate with

  9. #9
    Lead Moderator calikid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Sunny California
    Posts
    10,228
    Blog Entries
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by WildMage View Post
    not-sr71.jpg
    not sr-71
    Mutant SR-71?
    The scoop in front of the tail looks unusual.
    The undercarriage is strange too.
    Silhouette in the sun.... makes it hard to tell if it is even a real vehicle, or some photo montage.
    The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but
    progress. -- Joseph Joubert
    Attachment 1008

  10. #10
    Lead Moderator calikid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Sunny California
    Posts
    10,228
    Blog Entries
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Edgar Fouche View Post
    History of Space Command

    Most people thing the only way we can get into space with two or three stage to orbit vehicles using rockets. That is a total lie. We had space vehicles that could exceed Mach 6+ in the 60s and that's six times the speed of sound.
    We had vehicles back then that could climb in altitude to above 120 thousand feet. In the 70s we had a F-15 fighter aircraft that could fly high enough to shoot down satellites with missiles. Under the Aurora Program we had the SR-74 and SR-75. The Scramp could ride piggy back on the mother ship in a two stage to orbit launch. You will like this link:
    http://www.rense.com/ufo/triangUS.htm



    SPACE COMMAND

    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22h...history+secret

    https://www.google.com/search?q=%22h...m=122&ie=UTF-8

    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ci...rialtech07.htm

    "I hate to tell you, but these are not the infamous "Black Triangles" that I have seen. The one I saw was like 1000 feet long and like 800 feet wide in a huge isoceles triangle -- totally silent -- flying like 50 mph about 1000 feet up and then taking off to like Mach 20 in 2 seconds and disappearing in the distance at incredibly high speed... not making a sound."

    "Take it for what it's worth....but the some of the first TR3s were used in Gulf War I as support for some of the nighthawks, and vice versa. So, if you heard anyone from desert storm talking about flying triangles....there you go. They seldom flew alone. They almost always has nighthawks with them, and only flew from 2am local until 4:30 or 5am, depending.
    There were a few more exotics used as well...but first things first."

    "It's actually a plasma engine. Plasma can be used as an infinite source of electrical energy, if you can produce and harness it. I heard mercury was an important ingredient. I'm sure it's not mercury though, it's got to be something more than that."

    http://www.godlikeproductions.com/fo...sage643319/pg1


    Also, a “combined industry and government team” at LOCKHEED-MARTIN Skunk Works ( Palmdale, California ) was developing the X-33 for its AeroSpike XRS-2200 engine flight out of Edwards Air Force Base ( California ) scheduled for December of 1999.
    The Linear Aerospike XRS-2200 ( RS-2200 ) engine was developed by the ROCKETDYNE PROPULSION AND POWER UNIT of the BOEING COMPANY indicating they completed the engine in early 2000 although the F-117A Stealth fighter was already secretly flying ‘long before’ their official public information release.
    The difference between the linear AeroSpike engine and conventional rocket engines are the shape of the nozzle – unlike conventional rocket engines using a bell shaped nozzle to constrict expanding gases – the Aerospike nozzle is V-shaped and called a “sramp”.
    http://kentronintellectresearchvault.../tag/decipher/

    Darn Ed.
    Saw the drawing of the SR-75 and first thing I said to myself was "Wow! The flying triangle explained!"
    But your very next comment was "this isn't the flying triangle".
    Darn!
    The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but
    progress. -- Joseph Joubert
    Attachment 1008

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •