I heard this too. I was really disapointed in her opinion of Bushman but I have been disapointed a lot in my study of the subject. Her opinion was that his charecterization as being a scientist was as dubious as is Lazar. The only explanation would have to be that Bushman hoped to either profit, or get attention, although to do by misrepresenting himself only works to brings the subject into disrepute in the long run. Perhaps more can be found to resurect my opinion but this seems to be another dead end.