Originally Posted by
A99
Hi Marvin. It was very early in the morning when I posted those posts. Was still in the process of waking up and somehow when I skimmed over your first post, I missed the part where you said your image that you analyzed was from the NASA site. Didn't pay attention to that NASA link either. But like the fool that I am, I clicked on that article and from there I did that analysis. Wasn't until everything was posted that I went back and, this time round, carefully read over what you wrote about it. Yes, I did everything backwards...
So it's strange that NASA only had the compressed version of that photo up there and not the original. Very interesting.
I understand why you're saying what the author of that video did but it also looks to me like he digitally manipulated the compressed NASA photo to make those "teeth" look even more like "teeth".
But the fact that NASA only had the compressed version of that photo up on their site is much more intriguing... I agree.
Anyway, you're "The Photography Analysis Guy" and it's always a real pleasure to read whatever new analysis you post here. I just do things out of habit. I like to look at whatever you or anyone else analyzes in one of my own editors just to see if I can find anything else.