Nanoman - Chris H Cooper

[Longeyes]

'Nano Man' the nanotechnology scientist discovered by Jeremy Corbell were both on Coast to Coast last night

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2016/01/24

From the C2C page...

In the first hour, George Knapp welcomed filmmaker Jeremy Corbell, who is currently working on a project about a scientist he called "Nano Man." He was introduced to this person through a mutual contact in the U.S. Navy. Corbell described meeting in an atmosphere of paranoia, since "Nano Man"'s employers thought that Corbell was a government intelligence operative who wanted to steal ideas and technology. He advised that when dealing with people who work on sensitive projects, that "confidence has to be continuously earned" and that you must be able to keep secrets and release any information that is given to you in a timely fashion.

In the second hour, "Nano Man" was revealed to be physicist Chris H Cooper. For many years, Cooper has worked in the development of carbon nanotubes, which are composed of carbon molecules ten atoms thick, and that he twists into strings and cables that exhibit incredible strength. Another application for the nanotubes which Cooper has patented is a water purification system that was funded by a grant from the Air Force's Wright-Patterson Base in order to provide clean water for military personnel. Cooper says that it has also been used in developing countries in Africa as "a high-tech product in a low-tech environment."

Cooper says that what we know of physics at this time is "like comparing a drop of water to the ocean." He recalled that during the 1980s, discoveries were made that had direct bearing on the development of cold fusion, which Cooper has been studying for many years. In 2014 he says his research team produced a thermal output from a brass sphere filled with palladium and deuterium, which was converted into electricity that lighted an LED output. The experiment was captured on film by Corbell, who played an audio clip of the moment when this occurred, and said that Cooper's father (who has assisted in some of his projects) told him that the success of the experiment was "on par with the discovery of fire."

Cooper is also perfecting what he calls a "space drive." He described the principle of the quantum or zero-point field, which his drive uses as the medium to "push against" as aircraft use air or ships use water. He has demonstrated a working model to Corbell. The experiment was conducted in a private, underground laboratory and appeared to prove the concept, at least to the filmmaker's satisfaction. Using this drive, Cooper claims that spacecraft could reach Mars in two days and the nearest star in "a couple of months." Some of the materials for the drive were supplied by Bob Lazar, of area 51 fame.

Corbell also told the story of going to NASA's Ames Research Laboratory with a small vial of liquid that Cooper had given to him with what looked like metallic dust mixed in. When placed under an electron microscope, the "dust" appeared to be countless microminiature devices composed of "gears," "graspers," and other apparently machined artifacts. They called this substance "utility fog," a term coined in the 1990s, which refers to the theory of large groups of nanobots designed to perform a task at a molecular level. Cooper suggested that the material in the vial was collected in the aftermath of a UFO incident, and speculated that it may be the method used to produce crop circles, and recalled his own experience of standing in a crop circle while it was being formed. Corbell has four films planned that will feature the discoveries of Chris Cooper.


Jeremy Corbell's 'Nano Man' film
http://www.extraordinarybeliefs.com/#/i-am-nano-man/
There are going to be a series of these.

This is Chris Cooper's website
http://www.coopercoretechnologies.com/

[CasperParks]

Longeyes,

Thanks for the update.

[Longeyes]

Transcribing the interview with 'Nanoman' Chris Cooper this is Hour 2 of the C2C show and this as far as I got today. This guy is seriously talented and very well connected.
CC - Chris Cooper
GK -George Knapp
JC -Jeremy Corbell

GK: Our next departure point …this is the place to hear about some jaw-dropping scientific breakthroughs - work that could really change the world! And one of the scientists, on the front lines in many of these areas, is our next guest - he’s the Nano man. We’ve been talking about with Jeremy Corbell. An expert and a military funded nano-physicist, known for working on advanced propulsion systems, as well as nano-materials, cold fusion. And in a moment we are going to tell you who he is, introduce him and let him tell us about his work. Much more to come here on Coast-to-coast AM

GK: My next guest is a founder of a couple of private companies, one is Apollo Resource Corporation, another is Seldon Technologies. His expertise is in nuclear physics, quantum field theory, quantum computation, nanotechnology and large-scale nano-manufacturing. He’s already had patented applications: in the fields of fuel, air and water purification; energy production; propulsion; and high conductivity materials. He’s got patented, patents issued, and patent pending in the fields of water purification card and carbon nanotubes and nuclear physics. (1’30”) He has published articles and prestigious publications including the American Journal of Physics, Physical Review Letters and Chemical Review Letters. He’s got an MA in physics from the University of Washington and a BSc in physics from New Mexico State University and for two years he was adjunct professor at Dartmouth College, at the School of Engineering there. His name is Chris Cooper. We welcome him to the program! Chris, great to have you here!

CC: Thank you so much, it’s great to be here.

GK: Spill the beans. Are you okay with this nickname Jeremy is giving you - Nano man?

CC: It isn’t the first have got most of this nickname. Some of my scientists back at Seldon used to call me the Nano President (2’02”)

GK: Let’s start with, you know we’ve got so much to cover. I wanna start with the work you’re doing now. Where is your focus right now? Is it the carbon nanotubes?

CC: My focus right now is carbon nanotubes thread and cable

GK: Tell us what that means. I don’t even though that means? How do you describe it?

CC: About 10,000 years ago mankind figured out how to spin fibres into spun yarns and then figured out how to combine those into threads, ropes and cables. I’m using same techniques that essentially have been known for 10,000 years too spin molecules of carbon. And these molecules are very closely related to pencil lead, or graphene and these molecules are only about 10 atoms In diameter and I’m able to spin this material out into lengths 5 km long.

GK: And what are the applications? Where does this go?

CC: The applications are almost as broad as one’s imagination. The materials are used for electronic textiles, aircraft, spacecraft. Virtually every system and subsystem in aerospace could be dramatically enhanced with this material. Could also be using medical applications... (3’49”) … microscopic robots for micro-surgery, continuous miniaturisation of endoscopic surgery tools, as aircraft tires - the replacement of steel cables due to the material properties are far superior to steel cables.

GK: You know I know that one of the… some of this is future applications, but a lot of the work that you’ve done, is already out there being used, better for people. I’m thinking specifically - water purification. What you done in the area? And for Coast-to-coast purposes that might not be the sexiest topic, but in a practical way it changes lives of people, and will change more lives in the future. Talk about that for a moment

CC: Yes, it has, changed the lives of villages across Africa all the way to the space station. Umm we had tremendous success in deploying this technology into rural Africa and round the world. The technology was funded in part by the U.S. Air Force, by NASA, DARPA other agencies, as well as private capital and corporate sponsors.

GK: And what is it what does it do? (5’ 23”)

CC: I was able to figure out how to remove virus and bacteria and other microorganisms from water using carbon nano-tubes as the filtration medium. And, I was able to do that very high flow rates, without the use of power, didn’t have to boil water, didn’t have to add chemicals to the water. So, imagine highly contaminated water, even sewage level of contamination, being put through a simple filtration medium, what appears to be a simple filtration media, and getting potable water out the other side. So high-tech membrane for a low-tech environment, such as the developing world, or where you need mobile water.

GK: Maybe send some to Flint Michigan right now….

CC: Yes

GK …those of us to get clean water out of the faucet. We take it for granted, but so millions and millions, around the world, they don’t have clean water, they get sick it leads to strife and war, all kinds of things, and maybe the wars of the future will be fought over water so a huge strike.

CC: That’s right. In fact a child dies every five seconds from contaminated water.

GK: We’re going to talk about some of the big projects that Jeremy touched in the first hour. But I want to start with some general comments that you have made, that I’ve heard before, in interviews you’ve done with Jeremy that are included in his films. There’s a statement that you made “We know nothing our understanding of physics is at the kindergarten level.” What you mean by that? Expound on it.
CC: So I’ve had a very classic education in physics, clear through masters level physics, and err three years working towards a PhD in physics. And it becomes quite apparent that what we know about physics and what there is still so undercover, and understand about physics, like comparing a drop of water to the ocean.

GK: And this is an opinion you shared with colleagues at all levels? Is that a how others see it? You’ve worked on national labs haven’t you?

CC: Yes and err that my colleagues have shared with me their same opinion of the current state of physics, (8’09”) including colleagues of mine at Lawrence Livermore National labs and various schools I’ve attended, professors of mine and others. So amongst practitioners of physics people who have made it their career. When one gets know these folks as I have, they will share with you, the facts as they see it – that our understanding of physics still in its infancy.

GK: Jeremy, I’m asking you to comeback in here. You know I can imagine if Chris were to say that to, some of his colleagues at Lawrence Livermore Labs, which is one of the places he was at for a while, that some of them might take offence to it? Wouldn’t they?

JC: I think I think any great scientist looks at what they know, and realises that there is so much more that they don’t, and one of the things that I admire about Chris. He had this incredible ability to imagine the future, and to imagine the capabilities are of new technologies which led him to his carbon nanotube water filtration system discoveries, that really has changed the whole environment of water filtration and also it allowed him to do the same with propulsion, and simply investigate things that most people won’t touch with a 10 foot pole, because you know he knows, again kinda like you said ‘Our job is to investigate the unexplained not to explain the uninvestigated’ And Chris really goes for it and that’s something I admire about him.

GK: Chris, tell me about grant or contract with Wright Patterson Air Force Base. What was that for?

CC: Is the Human Effectiveness Division Wright Patterson Air Force Base (9’34”) and those folks are tasked with being able to provide clean water, clean air and medical grade medical, medical grade water particularly for air men and rescue operations. So, their Charter is this far beyond just military support, and they are chartered with this basic life support. And we were able through 12 years of development, to develop a real breakthrough water purification technology for those folks and our Senator Patrick Leahy labelled our technology ‘weapons of mass construction’. The Dubai Air Show featured some of products and the Air Force featured these water filters and some of the feedback they got from our allies in the Middle East, were stunningly positive. The feedback was ‘Our military was finally developing something that was useful to humanity not just building bombs’. (11’41”)

GK: I got the sense that speaking to Jeremy. You have concerns about where some of your research might lead, that you’ve put some distance between yourself and working for military, and working on military contracts is that true or am I over-stating it?

CC: Yes, I’m very interested in having my efforts really be focused on products and technologies that can be used in far larger sphere, for humanity, and for the betterment of mankind, not just for the purpose of national security. There are many smart scientists working for different national security agendas and I’ve made decisions along the way to really stay focused on using a lot of the same technologies but develop those to focus those energies products that can really help save lives and provide water, energy and other critical needs to advance technology.

[Longeyes]

GK: Some of the places where you worked do major important stuff working on national events, and we don’t actively pursue some of that, I mean obviously we need to defend ourselves, there was quote that you made to Jeremy, in one of the interviews. Where you said, we talked about the Reagan years ‘There was a huge leap made, a huge leap in understanding during Reagan years when the Star Wars project was under way’ Can you tell us what the huge leap was? And what the significance of it is?

CC: There was quite a lot of work in nuclear physics basic and fundamental theory in the 1960s, during the Reagan years the Star Wars program, we had another leap in understanding for Photonics and Nuclear theory which really helped drive a lot of fundamental support for the field of low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR) known as cold fusion (14’49”) certainly seen in the history of science, science will come in fits and starts, often a field will go dormant for many years and then get picked again with a fresh figure.

GK: Also along in the same of interview, that you gave, it really got my attention, you were talking about a time travel experiment. in essence, a time travel experiment regarding a gravity probe. And I didn’t really understand it and I don’t know it’s in connection with the same era that, Reagan’s Star Wars research era, but you said it had been funded by the National Science Foundation. What do you tell us about that?

CC: Yes, it was an experiment and it’s name is the Gravity Probe B and Prof Brown, I believe, has been developing a method using photonics to send information, back in time using entangled states, quantum states, the fundamental theory of this was laid down by Einstein it’s called the EPR Paradox taken to its extreme the theory predicts that one can send quantum states back in time and thus open the possibility, for information to be passed in the negative time direction.

GK: In that context though, you were talking about a top physicist, you didn’t name, but you said that he was scared of his own shadow and that something really weird is going on there. Is are we talking about? The time experiment? Or is there something else your referencing? (16’57”)

CC: Err, I’ve met a number of physicists who are have been very interested in the physics of time. Um, the one I think you referring to is actively looking at using methods of quantum decoupling to slow down time in an enclosed volume those experiments have been done by others, even decades ago my friend is currently interested in and is pursuing the replication of some of those experiments. Typically, those experiments lie outside the sort of ‘classic’ err, graduate student experiment in physics departments. (18’12”)

GK: Well, sort of like your space drive does. Let’s jump right into that. That seemed to be the heart of the conversation we want to have with you tonight. What is the space drive system that you’re working on? And I correct in saying but you made a presentation about it the Pentagon?

CC: Umm Yes, I did and the net result was an offer to fund the Space Drive Proposal. It was about that same time that I was starting to make serious progress towards the water filtration, reading between the tea leaves, it became quite apparent that if I continued to pursue departments defence funding for the Space Drive, in all likelihood it would become Special Access Program and basically disappear. So, we switched our focus at that time to water purification, the proposals that I submitted to the Pentagon in White Paper was quite lengthy and contained very serious mathematics concerning exactly what the underlying physics was…

GK: Well, I’m not gonna ask you to explain mathematics, because there’s sort of a general audience here, and it would go away over my head! But I am going to ask you to sort of describe how this system works what it would mean for space travel… (20’06”)

GK: We talking with nano-physicist Chris Cooper and filmmaker Jeremy Corbell, when we come back we getting to the Space Drive and how it works and what might mean to humanity… (20’15”)

21’02”
GK: Jeremy, I wanna bring you back in. When you explained it to you did you understand it. As he started to get into some maths there and I was worried about it, cause he was definitely gonna leave me behind.

JC: it’s actually quite simple and that’s what puts so fascinating. I want to relay this really funny moment. So, this is where everybody thanks we all think we’re taking one on the other, so was first meeting Chris Cooper, as I told you, everybody kind of kept us separate there was this big shut down within the company he was working with, because they thought I was connected somehow to the military intelligence looking at his work. We’ve had so many coincidences of people we’ve known and things that we’ve seen, that this funny moment happened where with his space drive it’s a really simple system. He has these meta-materials that put in at an angle, and essentially spun, and when they spin you get this propulsion phenomenon. Now what was so strange, I was sitting at the table, cameras rolling, and Chris gets super excited and he says ‘Ah great my new meta-materials are here’ And the UPS man is delivering them. He’s opening the box, and this is all on film, and all of a sudden the label and it says ‘United Nuclear ‘ I couldn’t believe it because that’s Bob Lazar’s company. These are the kinda coincidences that happen when working with Chris and he had no idea who he was buying these meta-materials from, to put in space drive. (22’34”) But again it’s a really simple system the way it was described to me, it’s like a paddle-wheel, so much in this meta-materials put inside of a cylinder and its spun, and when it spins it’s pushing against something, this is were Christ can explain this better, but it’s not highly technical because were in the kinda caveman phase of nanotechnology.

[Longeyes]

GK: Right, I’m just gonna ask him about that, just wanna mention the name, Bob Lazar, early birthday greetings go out to Bob, who turns 57, would you believe that? 57 years old on Tuesday. Chris tell me how you pitch this Space Drive? How it working layman’s terms?

CC: So in layman’s terms the Space Drive works the same physics as a fan. A fan has blades and it’s working in an atmosphere, and as blades move it pushes the air in one direction. So, the airflow is anisotropic so the airflow is pushing in one direction. So the best analogy is; think of the quantum field is a fluid. And we want move the fluid itself, the quantum field, so the concept is if we can move the quantum field like fluid, we have something to push against. Aeroplane rotors or helicopter rotor pushes against the air, submarine pushes against the water, in deep space you don’t have an atmosphere to run through your turbines. You have to take your entire reaction mass with you, and essentially throw it all away, by essentially throwing it out the back end of your propulsion system. The basic concept is; the entire universe sowed with this is called quantum field and if you can anisotropically pump the quantum field, you have yourself a Space Drive. So build a turbine. The question comes up of what materials do you build your turbine from out of? And what can how fast you have to spin your turbine? Well to answer those questions one has to understand a great deal about what the quantum field is, or at lease our best understanding of what the quantum field is. And so, even as an undergraduate I started studying exactly, trying to understand what is quantum field is. And there’s a number of theories; the theory of the Zero Point field where you have virtual photons that are everywhere throughout the volume of universe pushing against stuff, and in the very low temperatures particles to tend to wiggle around and according to this theory it’s because they’re being jostled by the Zero Point Field photons. (26’06”) In other theories you have the Dirac Sea, we have just bubbling foam of particles and anti-particles being created and annihilated, millisecond by millisecond. So under the viewpoint that the quantum field is comprised of photons, photons move very, very quickly, and if you to extend the analogy of a fan, you need to move your fan at a speed that is at least approaching the speed of the velocity of the air particles in the room, and thus you can move the air - you can create a force. On the case of the Zero Point field, those particles photons, moving around at the speed of light. So the closer one can get your fan blade to a relativistic speed, the greater likelihood you’ll actually have of being able to pump the quantum field or use the field as your reaction mass.

GK: I saw video or footage that Jeremy shot in one of your labs, that he’s describing this space drive and this thing is whirring around. So I guess the question is - does it work? Does yer, are you right?

CC: It would appear that the fundamentals work. That I am able to push against this quantum field and get a thrust, a propulsion from the device.

GK: Put me in more simple terms, what it would mean? That system works if someone wants to pump some money into it? What it would mean for space travel? Or us?

CC: It would mean we could get a probe to Mars in a few days using amount of force that I can generate right now.

GK: Have you? Has it occurred to you that you make this presentation to the Pentagon you gave them a paper. You kind of laid it out. I don’t how specific you got, but has it occurred to you since you didn’t choose to do that work maybe they have somebody else to do it?

CC: I have… …I am relatively certain but the work was picked up and shared amongst different departments in the government (28’51”) including NASA. And the most recent news articles that have come out about NASA’s warp drive, ah, ‘electric propulsion’, that they like to call it, is based on that very early work of mine, from 2002. And that was based on a virtual moving mirror, a device that use a phase transition superconductor to pump, or you could say push, push the Zero Point Field, the quantum field and produce a propulsion force. I also ran those experiments myself, and was able to generate a very small amount of propulsion force. My work in the years since has enabled me to amplify the amount of thrust that I’m able to achieve, using the same physics but in a very, very different embodiment. (30’15”)

[Longeyes]

GK: But Jeremy let me ask you. You’ve heard Chris’s explanation of this? The fact that he told the Pentagon about it in ’02. Makes you wonder whether some of these stories about Secret Space Program might relying on something a breakthrough that he made a while ago. What do you think?

JC: I find it really fascinating that one of people, who encouraged me greatly to follow Chris’s propulsion work, is highly involved in the Naval Space Programs and also just space programs in general. So, you know, I find it interesting that someone who’s been around the block with NASA and with all the Navy programs, you know is saying ‘This is it, this is interesting.’ And again I don’t think Chris is really telling you this detail. That just like you have a paddle-wheel for a boat, or you have an engine for air. The cool thing about the asymmetry within these nano meta-materials, I mean this is a new thing these materials, they push against a medium that is within the air, that is within the water, it is within outer space. It is a constant property that it can push against. So what Chris has developed in the space drive is essentially something that is continuous in any medium it can push against, that Chris has coined the quantum field. So it has very little limitations when you use it in any environment. And this is what’s so fascinating to me; this is a completely new concept for propulsion.

GK: So you can go to Mars in a couple of days. What other practical applications would there be for this thing?

CC: So the big money maker would be, for an operational Space Drive, be the recovery off assets from geosynchronous orbit, and beyond. Telecommunication satellites, when things go wrong for these very expensive systems - the cost of recovery to recover that asset to bring it down to low Earth orbit, repair the asset, and then return the asset to its operational altitude it is absolutely cost prohibitive. With a simple drone, using a simple space drone using this propulsion technology, even the amount of thrust I can develop today, would yield an incredible return on investment considering the number of assets that have failed, due to micro-asteroids, or to simple electronic failure, that could be repaired, if it were possible to ferry the assets back and forth.

JC: I’ve question to Chris if it’s ok?

GK: Sure

JC: I’m just curious. I’ve seen in multi levels of this device. You know I saw it on the air rail, on the oxcart, and then on the torsion pendulum, and the thing that always mystifies me… So you fire this thing up, it starts spinning in a vacuum, you can see right through it because it’s plexy on both sides. As it’s moving up an incline I can put my hand on the reverse side, and there is no air, there is no pushing anything that we know of! So it’s like magic, when I saw us the first time, it really was like magic. So, my question to you is like ‘Newtonian law something moving up an incline - it’s got to be pushing back? Something you have to have some kind of pushback. Where do you think this as its being propelled, what is it expelling into? What is the force? What is pushing into? This is one of the most fascinating things about seeing the Space Drive in action. (34’23”)

CC: So there’s this very vigorous debate in parlances of physics, concerning the nature of this quantum vacuum. And it is now experimentally seen and verified with the physics called Casimir Effect. You bring two contractors plates very close together, and at some point they slam together, there’s a force pulling together. And that is due to the exclusion of the Zero Point Field between the two plates. Interestingly, if you build a large metal box with conductor, the walls of the box don’t just collapse due to this force. So the question is how does this quantum field get inside the box? So, if we had a horse and we built a fence around the horse, so that they could graze the field. And then one day it rains and the horses get wet – we’re astonished because we built got a fence around the horses. How did the rain in to get the horses wet? (35’36”) The rain came in from a third dimension. If the Zero Point Field, the Zero Point Field photons as they are called coming in from a higher dimensional, then building a metal box conducting surfaces on all six sides of the box , in our three-dimensional space would prevent any electro-magnetic radiation from getting inside the box. But as this particular electro-magnetic radiation is coming in from high dimensions, maybe a fourth or a fifth dimension, then it would explain the phenomenon of how you can both have a measurable force that’s generated from the quantum field, and how the quantum field seems to get inside things that it shouldn’t. Just like your horses getting wet, even after you’ve built a fence around them.

GK: Wow that opens up a whole different kinda can of worms there! You’re not just talking about a propulsion system there; it’s a different model of reality! I mean it brings into the conversation multiverses and things of that sort…

JC: George, and it reminds me or something, when he first told me that it reminds me something spectacular. Chris and I visited with one scientist in Alma Gordo (37’01) who had worked on the nuclear program and is also been doing cold fusion work for the government, back in the day when they weren’t admitting it. And he had this really amazing theory about the UFO phenomenon. And when Chris described is pushing a force into another dimension, so we’re not experiencing like wind on your hand, but Space Drive is moving forward! But it’s pushing, expelling into another dimension. It goes right along with this absolutely wild theory, that this other scientists told Chris and myself, when we were there. Which was that his belief was that the Nuclear Program when we started detonating bombs, that’s kinda what alerted, in another dimension, these other beings, that were starting coming here. Again, that’s something again that’s way out there, but on a small scale the space drive, what Chris is really saying, as a layman I can understand it, is that we’re getting propulsion but what’s being expelled literally - expelling into another dimensional reality, that there’s waves of impacts in another dimension from what we’re doing here. So, that was a really interesting connection from this scientist that we talked with to Chris’s propulsion device. It may just be expelling into a different dimension. (38’17”)

GK: Well, Chris I can imagine the people, if there are people another dimension that I don’t want to breathe our exhaust? I mean I’m being facetious in a sense, but if they can feel it and we can’t, we might be attracting somebody else’s attention? Assuming there are people somewhere else?

CC: If the energy density of an atomic bomb sufficient to push subatomic particles out of our energy well, we call it ‘our universe’ and into somebody else’s energy well. They could very well be a visible in the event in adjacent spaces. Certainly with the Space Drive being able to operate within an enclosed metal box, speaks very strongly to, and if one holds to the conservation laws have to be extended to higher dimensional space, so that, for instance, for every action reaction there’s an equal and opposite reaction. If we’re using the quantum field to essentially push against it, in order to achieve propulsion, an equal and opposite reaction, that opposite reaction force could very well be spilling out into that high dimensional space.

GK: Wow, so it opens up all kinds of possibilities we have plenty of time to talk about in the next segment…. We’re going to get into cold fusion and a breakthrough that you’ve made… (40’23”)

END of the 2hr of the show

[calikid]

No you misunderstand Long Eyes
See my earlier post.
He claimed his new technology would get to Mars in two days (Knap thought he'd said three) but with present technology it takes two years.
But the Mars Rovers took just six months.
But as I explained above maybe Cooper was talking about present technology with a crew and freight supplies etc which I presume would take longer with a heavier payload.

But here I would like to say a big thank you Long Eyes for transcribing this interview - a lot of hard work! Did you do it all yourself?

Been awhile since college Astronomy class, but if I recall correctly Earth & Mars are close to each other once every two years. So suspect 2 years is a round trip estimate. 6 months travel time to Mars when it is close. Wait a year for the near alignment to approach again (time could be spent doing exploration), then six months for return trip. Two years total, round trip.
Launching any earlier would place you farther away. Take longer & use more fuel.

Two days for such a trip would be unbelievable!

[Believeit]

Been away from the forum for awhile, just stopping by now and again. This thread has brought me back. Most interesting. Thanks for your work with transcription, Longeyes!

[Longeyes]

Hour 4 C2C Nanoman Show

GK: We’re talking with ‘The Nanoman’ Chris Cooper and filmmaker Jeremy Corbell, and we’ve already have some pretty astonishing things so far about the discovery this stuff called Utility Fog, In which, titanium nanobots are shown under electron-microscopes and this sample was amazing stuff, was obtained from a crop formation that our guest, Chris Cooper was present along with five other people, when this thing sorta formed around them. That it sorta opened his eyes to other possibilities, and it’s been a factor and research that’s led to among of other things a Space Drive System that the Pentagon was interested in for a while. But there’s one more big development that we’ve only hinted about and that deals with cold fusion... (01’08”)

GK: Jeremy Corbell (1’16”) and let you set up this audio clip we are about to hear. I’m not sure you knew when he started working on this project with Chris Cooper that you’d… his research would take you into the area of cold fusion, or what your general knowledge of confusion was. I know that, in general, for a while we had and what look like a breakthrough by those guys Fleischmann and Pons, and then suddenly was discredited. And it seemed like whole thing went away or went underground or behind the scenes. But, you know in the public eye, it probably seemed pie in the sky. So why don’t you set up what we’re about to hear. (1’55”) What was going on as you working on this part of the project?

JC: Yeah, I mean, all of this has been a scientific learning curve with me, with a lot of my films, with Patient Seventeen, and all my work with Chris Cooper. You know, you realise you do a lot of sitting around, waiting to something to happen when you do a documentary. This experience is fantastic. We had spent a number of days talking about these breakthroughs that Chris was having with a number of scientists working on cold fusion. I must add, in 2007 Lawrence Livermore, Chris did achieve workable cold fusion, but he really wants to commercialise it was upscale it. (2’41”) So we’re there, and we’re going to the laboratory, and I think it was two days before were supposed to be go to this laboratory, and he’s saying ‘you know, we are gonna have this breakthrough. I’m sure we’ve got it to a level now’. And I said,’ Well, I have to film something - it’s a visual medium.’ And that’s when the idea of the light bulb came in. Well, if we can illuminate something it’s really gonna show the audience that your reaction has possibilities. You know, because to me this cold fusion this concept away outside myself. The way it could transform the world is so significant, so there I am, his father had put together this electronics package that would be able to take the temperature differential and turn it into electric power, if indeed we achieved, on that day, a true cold fusion reaction. And there we are, he sets it up, and it’s like one of the scientific days, you like, ‘Oh bummer it didn’t work’. So, we’re sitting there for about an hour, and they’re tinkering with getting the wiring right, and so I just start filming other stuff. I ‘m shooting ‘B’ roll of all this strange, Frankenstein equipment, that’s in this house. And then as my cameras just filming some device in another room, you can hear Chris screaming ‘Jeremy!! I can’t believe it!’ There was this incredible opportunity. Were just the camera happened to be rolling, you know, right when this happened. So that’s not audio clip you can hear; and I have full video of this diode being lit, which we think is the first time light bulb was ever been engaged through true cold fusion. So this is a kind of monumental historic moment and you’ll hear the audio and the excitement of my really nerdy friend who I love dearly Chris Cooper…

GK: Alright let’s play it. Play it and then let’s talk about.

AUDIO CLIP (4’29”)
CC: Oh my god Jeremy it’s working! …Oh my god!
There it is! There it is! I’m not going to touch it.
Come around, come around. I’m going to touch it. It’s blinking
JC: Where is it?
CC: Right over here you have to around
Dennis: Real electric power there we go! Oh my god Holy sh*t it really is working!
JC: Okay can I get a light on?
Dennis: I can’t you did it! We did it!
JC: Okay can I get a light on here?
Dennis: Oh my god
JC: Okay hold on guys
Dennis: Okayyyyyy! Oh man! Oh my God!
CC: You wanna get a picture of the thing?
Dennis: I can’t believe this. You get one fusion reactor with net power that’s burning a light… that’s infinite power… and he gets excited?!
CC (Might Chris’s dad): Go figure! Go figure! Dennis, this is bigger than the atomic bomb you know that, you even said it yourself.
Dennis: No it’s not - its a little biddy thing
CC (Same voice as above): Yeah, a little biddy thing
Dennis: The sphere is about the size of the uranium core of a bomb.
CC: Yeah, yeah.
JC: Okay guys hold on there I need some explanation.
Dennis: You wanna see this thing running here?
CC: Oh my god…
END AUDIO CLIP

[Longeyes]

GK: Jeremy’s gonna the post audio and video on his website extraordinarybeliefs.com. Chris walks us through that? How did you do that? Is it replicable? And what does is it mean? (6’07”)

CC: So, so the experiment was conducted in a completely enclosed sphere, of brass. Inside the sphere was the material cold fusion catalyst, in an atmosphere of hydrogen and deuterium, and this is the most remarkable cold fusion experiment I’ve ever seen because there is no input power. And what that means is, that the coefficient of performance, is basically a ratio of power in to the power out, but in this case there’s no power in. the whole thing is at room temperature and the device is as an elevated temperature. It has CHT so it’s COP, it’s coefficient of performance, is infinite. Zero power in real measurable power out. This was the most, is still the most extraordinary day of my scientific life - to actually see an electronic harvesting circuit, harvesting enough electro-power from the set of ?Poltee? devices around the outside the sphere. And it was able to, actually collect that’s thermal power, moving through ?Calseea? to convert that to electrical power. The energy harvesting circuit would collect enough of that power, to then light up an LED. And then it would flash an LED about once every second or so. And as far as I know that experiment demonstrating thermal to electric conversion, on cold fusion device, that required a zero input power had never been done before…

GK: Chris, this changes cold fusion…

CC: This is one of the most significant experiments in cold fusion, and can in my experience; it may very well be the most significant cold fusion experiment of all time.

GK: I mean it changes everything. Cold fusion changes everything right?

CC: Absolutely. There’s zero environmental impact, there is no radiation and the by-product of cold fusion is helium. Helium is a harmless gas that is used to inflate weather balloons, inflate balloons at a party, so absolutely benign, environmentally friendly and inexhaustible.

GK: You know I would think, but if you, I had made that breakthrough - that’s all I’d be working on even though your other stuff is all very interesting. That when you look at the ultimate potential of cold fusion, that’s my entire energy would be devoted there?

CC: So my current energy is devoted toward a carbon based material that is conductive, has extremely large surface area etc. And so the materials that I’m currently working on scaling up for manufacturing; this carbon nanotube thread and cable, is one of the potential products for this material I’m working on… is cold fusion. (10’22”)

GK: So it’s all kind of related? Cold fusion, space drive, carbon nanotubes? It’s all the same project just different aspects of it?

CC: It all uses the same platform technology.

GK: Jeremy, you’ve got that on film seems like that would be really big news?

JC: Well it is the first time anyone is hearing about it. I mean a lot of what I’ve filmed it’s behind by year, a couple years, you need to film it, you need to edit it. I do everything myself. So this is our first opportunity to kinda announce to the world, that Chris has, in his work, along with a few other cold fusion scientists achieved something which is truly remarkable. And a first and yes, it’s captured on film and there’s more to come on that. You get a little five minute free piece, and then I going to edit that entire series on cold fusion. So, I’m very excited I mean this a first to announce it on coast.

GK: And Chris do you publish? On that? Do you have any plans to share with colleagues it’s over for your forum or venue?

CC: So, the… my primary interest is to get these technologies commercialised, and viable commercialisation passes through the standard, raise money, build a team. Do the heavy lifting it takes to really optimise, optimise the process, optimise the material and get ready for prime time. So, I prefer to speak quietly and work diligently and deliver real products. Whereas when one looks the current state of cold fusion, there’s a lot of people talking about it and very few people actually doing anything about it. So there’s plenty of people being very vocal, and it’s just not my style I suppose.

GK: You mean people flapping their gums are not really doing the heavy lifting?

CC: Yes

GK: Okay, tell me this. So you know you shown it can be done in a lab? And if your work is in the carbon nanotube type of area? Can you protect the work that you’ve done? Patent it? Or otherwise prevented it from been stolen from you? I would imagine you wanna share it with humanity at some point?

CC: Yes, in fact the carbon nanotube cold fusion work, that I’ve done, has been patented, and was verified at Lawrence Livermore National labs.

GK: It was?

CC: Yes

GK: And is it published? Is it out general scientific community is it known?

CC: No, no, it’s not. It was a work for others contract back, in 2007, and I have been far more focused on the heavy lifting of commercialising these technologies and a lot was focused on publication and so forth.

GK: I would imagine that with this breakthrough that you’ve made the making a practical application of cold fusion putting it into a commercial point would take enormous amounts of resources? (14’44”)

CC: Ah yes. However, there’s enormous leverage that can be achieved through modern technology. What used to take incredible resources, back when I was commercialising the carbon nanotube energy filtering material, where we had to hire, you know, dozens of scientists to do the optimisation of these materials. Today, it’s really much more suited toward automated materials discovery….

GK: So Jeremy talk…

CC: …it takes less and less resources if the technology around you is advancing at the rate that it currently is.

GK: Who else is currently doing good stuff? Good work on cold fusion, Chris?

CC: There’s as a number of, there’s a number of groups doing really good work in this field of cold fusion. Researchers there probably two dozen researchers, that are currently in laboratories, that are doing really ground breaking work in this field. The work of Peter Hagelstein professor at MIT has most significant breakthroughs in the theoretical underpinnings of cold fusion.

GK: And Jeremy your plans for the material you have? It’s more than one film project?

JC: I mean there’s 3 to 4 primary film projects. So, I’ve been following Chris for a number of years. So, just now I’m going to be able to release the second episode, in the Nanoman series, called ‘Space Drive’. And that’s actually, in February, it’s going to premier at the International UFO Congress. And at that night which is mid-December, it will be available as the second episode to download and watch. That’s my goal to slowly turnout, turnout different episodes about Chris’s work. So now, obviously I have to get into and cut the cold fusion piece, into its full glory, because people now know about it. So each piece kinda comes out like that… so we have ‘Cold Fusion’, ‘Space Drive’, the ‘Utility Fog’ If I can get a part 2 on that, and then also the work that Chris is doing with carbon nanotubes and the weaving all of these materials which have incredible properties. (17’33”)

GK: Chris the other voice we heard in that audio clip, we heard Jeremy, we recognise your voice, that other voice was your father. Tell me about his role in the work that you guys are doing must be really proud moment for him as well?

CC: Actually that was the voice of one of our other scientists, who has been working in the field of cold fusion since before Pons and Fleischman. And he was doing work in the field of cold fusion for the U.S. Air Force long before Pons and Fleischman.

GK: Well that was still a pretty exciting moment for him then?

CC: It certainly was.

GK: You’ve had conversations since then with him?

CC: Yes he is... we are continuing to collaborate on bringing this effect and this technology to commercial levels of power production.

GK: And let me ask you about your father then, because I having seen those videos clips, I’d assumed that’s who we were seeing. Is he involved directly in this part of the work?

CC: Yes, my father has been involved in this research even joined me for campaigns out at Lawrence Livermore in 2007. He is an accomplished electric engineer, worked at White Sands Missile Range and is very good at building feedback control systems.

GK: Well he must have pretty proud as he heard that news….we are going to take a break… (19’20”)