Above shows the 2D central area in the video posted earlier. Below, is the same image in 3D
In the 3D image, look very close at the "Liam Neeson" type nose and focus on the amazing structure which "incorporates" the structure "in font" and "behind".
Absolutely beautiful design.
It's important to get your eyes around this so take your time.
I thought this a worthwhile mention, a point on the above image.
As I have stated many times before, the "artists" responsible for these astounding renditions (holographic surface manipulations) have a certain style in their compositions.
Below is one of the most breathtaking renditions of a human female facial and torso profile, which I found several years back (2010 I believe) in the images captured by the Opportunity rover taken from Duck Bay on the rim of Victoria Crater https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mer/images/pia100007.html
Notice the way they emphasize the effect of "shiny hair" ...a most magnificent optical illusion!!
This method can be seen in the cartoonized hair of the Scooby Doo hair ensemble in the above anaglyph.
An unmistakable and hauntingly beautiful style!
In a comment made yesterday, that the above image did not show her location in Victoria Crater clearly enough.
So here ya go.
Ain't she a beauty!! I have to admit, they have great talent.
Last edited by M-Albion-3D; 01-04-2019 at 06:45 AM.
I should have mentioned on the above image "rocky escarpment"
Can you see the NEXUS?
The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but
progress. -- Joseph Joubert
Attachment 1008
Sure, a "Nexus" is really a noun I thought appropriate. So in many instances, there are several "other renditions" in the immediate vicinity of the "obvious eye-catcher" which in many ways, validates the persistence of design. http://www.theoutpostforum.com/tof/s...ll=1#post48167
This is the tough one. When we look at the rocky VC escarpment, the mind normally asks the question; "this can't be a face, it can only be a coincidence of rock strata formation" and for one main reason....IF the images of faces etc. are real, then they can only have been produced with a technology which I am unfamiliar with".
The answer to the above is, yes.
Remember also this. "We are looking at only pixels".
Here is a very close "local" example of the Nexus:
In the left hand image we see a canine. And in the right hand image, we see a rather ugly "demon" type chap with his arm raised.
But they share the same eye, typical of design of "two heads in one"
There are many more in the rocks.
Here's another in the vicinity.
May take a moment or two to get your eyes around this as the two facial features are looking in opposite directions.
Distance Perception.....
At this point, most all I'm sure will be engaging in a faux rapport....... this is all a "brainchild known as pariedolia".
I spent many an hour in the now defunct Meta Research Forum discussing this fallacy and can say, it's been a very effective cover story.
What is on Mars is not paredolia, (I wish it were that easy) visually, the consistency (congruence) of the patterns are completely inconsistent with the defined parameters of the paredolia legend.....and that's just to begin.
Apart from the possibility that a face in the clouds have similar puffy cheeks, there's little chance we can group them with intelligent "STYLE".
Style is a product of intelligence, recognizable style is a product of intelligence...absolute. IMO.
There is so much to gather from these embedded manifestations it boggles the mind.