Wiki leaks Podesta / Tom de Longe

[Garuda]

George Knapp / Klas TV got a copy of the document where the DoD authorized the release of three videos that TTSA published.

https://www.lasvegasnow.com/news/loc...eos/1963912703

And again, John Greenewald says there's something not right with it:

https://www.theblackvault.com/casefi...ondo-and-ttsa/

[Longeyes]

I don't know what Mr Greenewald thinks is at the bottom of the well?
He's like a dog with a bone, I guess that's what makes him brilliant at what he does.
For me, you just have to listen to Luis Elizondo to know he's telling the truth.
He's lost his job to help get this off the ground, they've tried to be as straight with people as possible.
Both Elizondo and TTSA have delivered on their promises.
Mr Greenewald should just let it go.

[Longeyes]

Read it all the way through, weird how it's not signed, the descriptions maybe the only one sanctioned by the DIA?
Luis Elizondo also mentioned that he got TTSA's coi (community of interest) website sanctioned by the DOD i.e. as a contractor?. It was supposed to be a public database for sightings. Could this be what he was referencing?
But you can see how this release form would drive anyone whose job it was to normally release DIA forms pretty irate, it appears as though he's pushed the form through himself, l can't see any other reason it's not signed, told a couple of 'white lies' to get it out.

But what I do firmly believe is that he is doing this for the greater good.
He knew the system from the inside well enough to work it.
Without those videos from TTSA, the Dec 2017 NY Times articles would never have been published.
And TDL's project would never have got off the ground.

[Longeyes]

Seems the Navy won't share information for their new guidelines with the public.

Joe Gradisher, a spokesman for the office of the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Warfare, said in a statement...

“Military aviation safety organizations always retain reporting of hazards to aviation as privileged information in order to preserve the free and honest prioritization and discussion of safety among aircrew,” Gradisher said. “Furthermore, any report generated as a result of these investigations will, by necessity, include classified information on military operations.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...c04_story.html

Plus all the standing 'experts' are now wading in.
In the article someone from SETI is saying "it's just foreign tech" they are looking at.
Makes your blood boil, arrogant ppl.
Every scientist whose looked at these things has said they defy anything we have.
Unless Russian and China are leaps and bounds ahead of the USA, we know of nothing that can travel at 30.000 miles an hour and not burn up, let alone travel through water and space at the same time.

[Longeyes]

Chris Melon writes in the Hill
Suggesting Congress needs to get the facts and UAPs need to be studied

https://thehill.com/opinion/national...ss-should-find

[Longeyes]

Alexander Rojas interviewed the producer on Unidentified Anthony Lappe.
Rojas has seen the first episode and seems very impressed.


http://www.openminds.tv/anthony-lapp...-21-2019/42373

[Longeyes]

Ufo Jesus breaking the news that TTSA have partnered with Boeing, Lockheeed Martin Skunkworks, Wright Patterson Base on developing the properties in one of the ADAM samples.

[Longeyes]

Article about Deep Prasad
https://www.punkrockandufos.com/blog...ew-deep-prasad

The University of Toronto once asked the question if tech prodigy Deep Prasad (then an undergrad) could “be the next Einstein.”

At age 23, Prasad is the CEO of ReactiveQ, which aims to create the world’s first quantum computer, as well as work on producing superconductors and meta materials. The young star of innovation is also an avid UFO advocate; he’s one of us. Part of ReactiveQ’s mission statement states they are “actively engaged with engineers from TESLA, Lockheed Martin, Volkswagen and NASA in order to validate solution.”..

[Garuda]

Some days ago, The Intercept cast doubt on Elizondo's position within AATIP:
https://theintercept.com/2019/06/01/...ondo-pentagon/
TLDR: Keith Kloor claims there is no evidence to support that Elizondo worked in AATIP or was its leader.

So Kurt Collins decided to start tracking Elizondo's role, and this is what he found thus far:
http://www.blueblurrylines.com/2019/...eadership.html
TLDR: documents released by Knapp and further inquiries with the Pentagon confirm that Elizondo was involved in AATIP, but there is still no hard proof of the role he played.

My take on it: this debate is not about the message, not even about the messenger himself but about what role he played within a program whose existence was confirmed. This debate focuses on aspects that are far less relevant and important, and is therefore a distraction.

[newyorklily]

Some days ago, The Intercept cast doubt on Elizondo's position within AATIP:
https://theintercept.com/2019/06/01/...ondo-pentagon/
TLDR: Keith Kloor claims there is no evidence to support that Elizondo worked in AATIP or was its leader.

So Kurt Collins decided to start tracking Elizondo's role, and this is what he found thus far:
http://www.blueblurrylines.com/2019/...eadership.html
TLDR: documents released by Knapp and further inquiries with the Pentagon confirm that Elizondo was involved in AATIP, but there is still no hard proof of the role he played.

My take on it: this debate is not about the message, not even about the messenger himself but about what role he played within a program whose existence was confirmed. This debate focuses on aspects that are far less relevant and important, and is therefore a distraction.

My guess is that the role Elizondo played in AATIP is classified.

Sent from my moto g(6) using Tapatalk