Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 891011 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 106

Thread: Donald Trump and Disclosure

  1. #91
    Lead Moderator calikid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Sunny California
    Posts
    10,228
    Blog Entries
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Wally View Post
    When watching clips from that Leslie Stahl interview of Trump she did for 60 Minutes it struck me that his eyes looked incredibly baggy. Whether that is due to stress or just old age though I don't know, so make of it what you will.
    They say "Heavy is the head that wears the crown".
    IMO, many Presidents look MUCH older when leaving office, when compared to their first arrival (at the White House) photos.
    Probably the stress associated with the job.
    I can only imagine insider knowledge of an "ET Presence" is one of those stressful issues that could age a man prematurely. Especially if the topic is presented purely from a Threat Assessment POV.
    The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but
    progress. -- Joseph Joubert
    Attachment 1008

  2. #92
    Especially if the topic is presented purely from a Threat Assessment POV.
    It certainly does seem like that is the POV that our gov'ts are operating in.... and I find that very unsettling.
    HTML Code:
    For it is in giving that we receive.
    ~ St. Francis of Assisi

  3. #93
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Malibu, California
    Posts
    568
    Quote Originally Posted by M-Albion-3D View Post
    There's Orin-gee!

    OT Image removed by Moderator.
    Opps, pardon my error Cal, I just couldn't resist. I'll watch my step. Cheers!

  4. #94
    I think Disclosure is now completely dead in the water.

  5. #95
    Lead Moderator calikid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Sunny California
    Posts
    10,228
    Blog Entries
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by GusB View Post
    I think Disclosure is now completely dead in the water.
    That may be true today.
    But after some time has passed, and the President has had time to settle into office, I am hopeful he may be briefed and decide to share (Twitter might be our friend ).
    So, down the road a bit.....
    The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but
    progress. -- Joseph Joubert
    Attachment 1008

  6. #96
    OT POST DELETED BY MOD.

    Thinly veiled OpEd pieces are still considered Off Topic.
    Stick to paranormal research, NOT politics.

    Consider the MANY political forums on the web today.
    (feel free to visit if you need to air your political opinions).
    Now consider TOP Forum a place to escape those stressful debates.
    A place to discuss other more interesting topics.
    Last edited by calikid; 01-30-2017 at 02:21 PM. Reason: MOD deletion, OT & Trolling.

  7. #97
    The Mod that did this please PM me

  8. #98
    Lead Moderator calikid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Sunny California
    Posts
    10,228
    Blog Entries
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by GusB View Post
    The Mod that did this please PM me
    Sorry for the delay, long day at work.
    Check your PM now.

    CaliKid
    The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but
    progress. -- Joseph Joubert
    Attachment 1008

  9. #99
    So,

    I have noticed every Presidential election cycle, there is always a lot of scuttle butt about Disclosure coming from the White House!!!

    Maybe Dan Smith started that idea way back when he was dreaming up his BPWH or some such. You know, him and his buddy Ron, now that's a cliff hanger!

    From Ronald Reagan (1985) up until now it ain't happened. Although perhaps Reagan came the closest.

    I still maintain real disclosure will eventually come from one or more ETs themselves, in an undeniable event.

    Ha! another $.02 worth from me.

  10. #100
    Lead Moderator calikid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Sunny California
    Posts
    10,228
    Blog Entries
    19
    There is a distinction between debating a person's ideas and attacking a person.
    The first is allowed, encouraged even. Attacking a person is not.
    If it is a member, an author, or even POTUS, personal attacks are not allowed on TOP Forum.

    This rule seems to have been forgotten by some participating in this thread.
    Staff is evaluating this thread to determine if it has run it's course.
    Possibility exists it will be locked soon.
    The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but
    progress. -- Joseph Joubert
    Attachment 1008

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •