This is a confusing topic for me so to get the show on the road, I'm using the following quote from an online article as a springboard...
http://www.timcolemanmedia.com/index...dents-and-ufosIn addition to this it is clear that because the UFO subject is such a serious National Security issue and therefore classified at the highest levels, the President, despite being the chief of the Armed Forces, would not necessarily possess a high enough security rating to allow him access to all the classified information on UFOs.
Because the president has the power to fire generals, admirals etc, if he wanted to know about ufos, wouldn't it make sense for him to keep firing top military personnel, right on down the line, until he gets one that's willing to give him those top secret files on that?
Also, because the president is the one who appoints the CIA director... because he has his own guy in that position, one would think that that person would give the president whatever information there is about ufos and those top secret files on that too if he asks for it. right? If the guy doesn't want to give it to him then he can simply have him replaced with someone else who will give it to him.
But back to that statement I quoted from that article.... it's basically saying that whomever/whatever is controlling ufos... that they are hostiles. There does not seem to be any ambiguity in that sentiment but what criteria are they basing it on? Also, because UFOs are, as they say, a 'serious national security issue', one would think that to deprive the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces (the President) crucial information on that, pretty much renders that position inconsequential. right?