Yes I did quite some time back. There are several interacting factors that dismiss pareidolia, some of which are shown here:http://www.theoutpostforum.com/tof/s...ll=1#post54524Originally Posted by calikid
The ubiquity of the same "properties" appeared as "commonality" or style, patterns depicting the same or similar "stroke of hand".
In the designs frequently uncovered, was a type of signature, (in fact, there were several connecting points) one of which was the style of depicting "two faces in one rendering". And this illusion is found here in earthly designs over the course of time, but, they are complex designs with forethought of objective requiring intelligent input and many artists have laid claim to fame using this technique. A few examples can be seen in the above post.
Of course, this takes time to research and connect the dots in reviewing hundreds of NASA high-resolution MRO images..
Again I stress, this is only one aspect of commonality in the rendering, others have an astounding fondness for "infantile earthly overtones" shall we say, another is the clear depiction of morality e.g. 'the predator and prey". This can be very easily shown in image examples.
However, once the viewer begins to comprehend the apparent method of production, this consistent pattern eventually leads one to surmise, that an alien technology must be employed and is currently unknown by humankind...presumably. A "Eureka Moment".
That instant moment in time when one realizes, what you are viewing on the surface can only be of intelligent design and not only that, the amount of evidence is quite overwhelming.
And btw, the in-depth story of pareidolia and its origins is steeped in mung, another factor to consider and weight to the "myth created" or "how convenient" controversy.
Anyway,
This is where I have arrived, others may see(k) another path, it is, a deeply personal discussion.
Reply With Quote