Interview with Lyn Buchanan former US Army CRV

[Wansen]

Came across this interview and found it not only quite interesting but also compelling.

Compelling because Buchanan seems quite rational and believable and given his background, it seems plausible that he would be at least partially in the know.

I found his comment about some of the Army's research projects being the stuff of "nightmares" totally in line with some of the (very little) information I learned while in uniform.

In it, Buchanan discloses some very interesting information:

In response to the interviewers question "are there any structures on the moon?", Buchanan replies "none that I can talk about " but he does unequivocally state that there ARE discovered remains of a past civilization on Mars. He claims he personally 'viewed' them and that they were subsequently located.

He also speaks about his direct knowledge of (at least) four different types of ET visiting earth and that (at least) two of the types are telepathic. He said that one telepathic type is friendly and that the other type is not only decidedly unfriendly, but wants every human exterminated.

What I found quite fascinating is that Buchanan further states that CRV can see the past, present and potentially, the future. His tone became a bit sober while talking about 'viewing' the earth in the future (the year 2080 to be exact) and that he saw a world largely devoid of population, empty or nearly empty cities and people living in small rural agrarian communities.

Approximately 103 minutes in length:

[A99]

I'm watching that vid now but before I continue watching the rest of it, I just wanted to mention what the interviewer brought up about the movie "Men Who Stare at Goats" and that because it was a comedy, it reached a broader audience than if it was presented otherwise and I thought he's got a point about that and I agree with him. Packaging the truth in the form of entertainment in order to reach and educate the general public is definitely a worthwhile route to go and this includes a comedic presentation of that "truth" too; if it's handled the right way.

[Wansen]

I'm watching that vid now but before I continue watching the rest of it, I just wanted to mention what the interviewer brought up about the movie "Men Who Stare at Goats" and that because it was a comedy, it reached a broader audience than if it was presented otherwise and I thought he's got a point about that and I agree with him. Packaging the truth in the form of entertainment in order to reach and educate the general public is definitely a worthwhile route to go and this includes a comedic presentation of that "truth" too; if it's handled the right way.

An astute observation as usual. It's interesting to note the findings of a rare nugget of truth, even if sometimes embedded within a cloak of fiction.

I'm speculating that Buchanan is one of the "old boys" Dean mentioned as tutoring him on CRV.

[A99]

I'm still watching that vid. Not sure who Dean is but like most remote viewers, Buchanan says, more or less, that no one knows where information comes from wrt to those 'psychics' who are not RVer's. I know with absolute certainty that psychic information can come from those who reside in other dimensions nevertheless I also am fully aware of the limitations of getting info that way. One being that you have to work with the ebb and flow of being privy to such information and that you're dealing with personalities that will only give info on some things but not others. But even that can be inconsistent.

Most of those personalities will present themselves as disincarnates but not all of them. And for that matter, it's foolish to accept with 100% certainty that they are who and what they say they are in the first place no matter how accurate they are when answering personal information about whomever they say they are that you already know. This is because they can glean that info from your mind.

In other words, if you already know the answer to any question you ask them, they can end up answering the question correctly because they will have attained that info from your mind.

[A99]

There are a few ways to get info that way, one being EVP for those who have been engaged in recording EVP for a long time. But one can be born a receiver via telepathically too. The good ones are usually both.

RV though offers yet another route to go though but true RV requires a set-up that involves the participation of others in each session. That can be impractical when one needs info right away. But I have a lot of respect for that technique because it offers everyone the chance to have some success in getting clairvoyant information. EVP is like that too but for newbies it's only good for spirit contact. But, once again, one never knows who or what is actually communicating to them, when using that method, regardless who they claim to be.

Cayce claims his info came from his higher self. Info can be attained that way too. I suspect that most psychic non-RVers get info from their higher selves.

This is where the distinction between the 'medium' and the psychic comes in. One can be a medium and not a psychic. I'm a medium.... and not by choice either.

I ended up with a number of enemies in the EVP community because unlike them, I'm saying that we can't trust whom and what those voices say they are.

I'm not ruling out that there's a whole other intelligence out there that operates on the EM spectrum. One that we haven't named yet.

[A99]

Buchanan is quick to say that he doesn't know where non-RVer psychics get their information but based on what he's saying in that video, he doesn't know the source of RV information either. So there you have it.

Just saying that the info comes from the subconscious mind is not specific enough. All psychic info comes through the subconscious mind but that does not mean that it's the original source of that kind of information.

[A99]

Let's look at ESP. Here's the Wiki write up on that:

Extrasensory perception, ESP or Esper, also called sixth sense or second sight, includes reception of information not gained through the recognized physical senses but sensed with the mind. The term was adopted by Duke University psychologist J. B. Rhine to denote psychic abilities such as intuition, telepathy, psychometry, clairaudience, and clairvoyance, and their trans-temporal operation as precognition or retrocognition.^[1]
Parapsychology is the study of paranormal psychic phenomena, including ESP. Parapsychology has been criticized for continuing investigation despite being unable to provide convincing evidence for the existence of any psychic phenomena after more than a century of research.^[2]The scientific community rejects ESP due to the absence of an evidence base, the lack of a theory which would explain ESP, and the lack of experimental techniques which can provide reliably positive results; and considers ESP to be pseudoscience.

The reason why science can't reliably test it is because we can't control those intelligences that work through us that generate any of those phenomena mentioned above. If we were able to do that, RVers would have been able to locate where Malaysia Flight 370 went down. But no RV group was able to do that. But that's just one example. When it comes to the paranormal, there's a trickster element involved that's completely beyond our control. It involves an intelligence that operates outside of our physical realm. At times it may work through us but we have no control over it. 'It' is the one that calls the shots. Not the other way around.

[Fore]

6 Min in, and he's talking about utilizing the higher mind.

[Notes: what gets me is that he seems to be confused or unsure. You'd think with someone of his talent he'd be rigid in describing the tools.
As he said, it is almost like martial arts training. Except your conditioning various components to work together.

He's basically alluding to starting off with training people to cognizant to create a sort of one-way interface with their subconscious faculties (their own individual higher mind).
I agree with what he's stated that natural psychics without training generally (not always) have little control over their abilities.]

---------

7 Min in, he seems to be skipping over the details so far. Seems to be skipping important talking point. Talks about the individual higher mind faculties but skips other essential details about basic techniques.

Interesting, did not know what CRV actually meant. Also interesting how they distinguish it from RV.

[Notes: Also interesting that the individual is talking about a certain kind of psychic control. He's mentioned a lower form of RV (by ET standard not human) where the perception data at the higher mind levels is not processed in coherent form nor seemingly pre-processed and injected as an coherent experience of the physical senses. Instead he describes the beginner strategy of injecting signals randomly and processing the data ?incoherently? at the physical level.

Perhaps some kind of odd technique that involves peer review and multi-session coherence through physical consultation with other CRV individuals on the same target. Seems unnecessarily underdeveloped. Guessing he is hiding actual techniques in use by CRV? Usually in ET experiments this development phase did last more than a year or two. Hard to imagine CRV researchers being limited to that level of operational activity. (>?) ]

--------------

10 min in, having difficulty understanding the guest. Seems to not be a developed group of CRV individuals. Seems to lack essential components. Human development can't be that far behind the ET's, can it? Should be standard implementations by now. (well by decades now)

[Notes: Individual gives strangely low grade developmental knowledge on the subject so far.
Another interesting tidbit is that the interview is devoid of any actual implementation technique from what I can see.
For example, he talked about ciphers for referring to targets. But these are not like ET RV where the profile data of a target (human being/object/event) is given.
Deep question marks in my mind about this. Would this imply they utilize a third party psychic to give the essential pointers? Or are the pointers housed within an individual on site? Seems like most of the implementation is questionable.

Does not follow ET design methodology for the most part. Seems to be lacking in principles of basic implementations. Is there a third party onsite with psychic data unbeknownst to the CRV practitioners? Without Reference pointers the lines of association cannot be established and the logical conclusion of the CRV is failure.
Perhaps they are leaving out classified information in the interview? Logically, it does not fly without a couple of more implementation points.

Maybe the interview is intended intended as a honey pot to paint targets interested in the material???? <mega-shrug>
Or perhaps this is a loop hole in a policy being exploited? Hmm, it's like describing a vehicle and engine without mentioning the necessity for tires or the steering wheel. Odd interview so far.]

---------

11min in, getting the distinct impression this is less about a working CRV implementation and more about a third party using supposed CRV practitioners as end-points. None of the story seems to point to a well thought out implementation so far, nor of rigid protocols. It's like some third party concocted a way to use some CRV military personnel to leak information to, via their own individual higher mind. Of which the higher mind protocol implementation for this interview is seemingly largely absent.

It makes more sense for me to assume they are unwittingly being fed information. Probably some (psychic) third party with a booklet with a list of ciphers and what the intended cipher refers to. CRV'ers that are using referential cyphers that mean nothing by themselves, but only a psychic third party on-site would seemingly know what these ciphers refer to. Seemingly unbeknownst to the CRV practitioners themselves? That is why I keep wondering if this is some kind of policy loop-hole being exploited by a psychic third party.

If it is just a third party who isn't known to the CRV folks themselves, it makes perfect sense that they would only need to know the bare minimum (referential ciphers) and that their implementation seems extremely incomplete (unnecessary?). They just barely appear to know they have a higher mind and they basically don't seem to be using an actual working implementation that doesn't involve a third party to make it function.

So far it almost looks like they are being treated as endpoints with extremely limited knowledge. Enough to be used as automatic writers but not enough to be an independent working unit by themselves. Lets see if the rest of the interview turns this suspicion around or not.

[Fore]

OMG,
12:30 seconds, the guy confirms he doesn't even know where the information comes from. Oh boy, CRV huh? <skeptical>

Even when you do sessions for the ET, you really know alot about the target. This is clearly looking like a person who doesn't have a real CRV implementation. RV modes are immersive and you certainly will know quite a bit. Even querying the details is enough to fill in the gaps.

So basically, this guy is (as far as it looks and sounds) is just an endpoint for some other unknown party feeding them information as sensory input.
Which begs the question, the third party who holds the cipher booklet, are they even human or not?

If the third party aren't even human, then it makes sense they would use these folks as workaround to feed the CRV'ers detailed information.
If the third party is human, they it makes no sense for the CRV unit to even exist. As the CRV unit seemingly only has a talent for writing down what they sense coming through their higher mind as it filters into their physical senses. (?)

This is a definite curiosity for me.
--------------------

13min in, you are a filter, and the interviewed says "yeah". Well, so much for actual CRV.
He's just a psychic (yeah technically) sitting around smoking and receiving input from the actual psychic and simply committing to paper what he gets. All he seems to be doing is receiving basic training to be that endpoint. No wonder if found it strange that they keep using ciphers that mean absolutely nothing to the psychic. Makes total sense. He's just unwittingly passing it to the other third party who actually knows what it means and what it connects to.

Would be nice to see an interview where they are actual CRV practitioners in the whole. Where there is an actual working implementation and they actually know where the information comes from and when, why and how they can obtain it remotely.

------------
15min in, his analogy on precog is like someone with more experience.

----------
22min in, describes his psychic field disturbing electronics system. Typical of someone with a large influence field.

----------
25min in, he talks about how they distinguish correct from incorrect data. Like I assumed, they are using peer review process and comparisons on what is consistently the same.

----------
28min
Describes the differences between being detected when using RV vs CRV.
I am guessing the difference is because the CRV is outsourced by a professional third party. While his own RV sessions (handled by himself using his own internal ability) aren't at the same level as the third party. Thus probably one is harder to detect than the other, because the level of sophistication and applied technique is probably different.

---------

30mins probably referring to the probability axis changing by using ESP. Also seemingly refers to "updates" being necessary. Likely referring to the noticeable paradoxes (errors) of moving from one probability axis to another and how they shift the observers viewpoint in terms of probability.

(Sorta like moving horizontally in a probability axis or world lines as I think they call it these days.)

35min, they also use a monitor? Thats strange.
ET experiments always have a monitor who checks if your accessing info your not supposed to and evaluates performance.
Not really sure what a human monitor would be useful for. Even as a psychic? <puzzled?>

I've noticed some of the human RV'ers who checked me out (probably as tasked assignments) after talking about certain topics in detail; do seem have a supervisor who isn't human. They seem to monitor the connections the RVers are making. But they have them little white rooms with curved fabric (or made of something formed in curved rooms). And those human beings are taking injections of something white on a regular schedule. Their sessions seem to last about 45mins max. The RV'ers background details are also missing as if their personality is a clean slate. No personal history.

As soon as you try reading them back to gather details, the Supervisor (ET) who monitors them from a separate area interrupts the RV'er and cuts off the connection. Which seems like a completely different implementation than the CRV being described.

------------

39mins, talks about remote influencing. Seems to know about the subject first hand. Not surprising considering his influence field is large enough to disrupt electronics.

-----------
54min
I think he possibly mistakes the range issue on certain modes for ET. That he noticed limitations on certain implementations is worth an award by itself. Good job in either case.

[Wansen]

OMG,
12:30 seconds, the guy confirms he doesn't even know where the information comes from. Oh boy, CRV huh? <skeptical>

Even when you do sessions for the ET, you really know alot about the target. This is clearly looking like a person who doesn't have a real CRV implementation. RV modes are immersive and you certainly will know quite a bit. Even querying the details is enough to fill in the gaps.

So basically, this guy is (as far as it looks and sounds) is just an endpoint for some other unknown party feeding them information as sensory input.
Which begs the question, the third party who holds the cipher booklet, are they even human or not?

If the third party aren't even human, then it makes sense they would use these folks as workaround to feed the CRV'ers detailed information.
If the third party is human, they it makes no sense for the CRV unit to even exist. As the CRV unit seemingly only has a talent for writing down what they sense coming through their higher mind as it filters into their physical senses. (?)

This is a definite curiosity for me.
--------------------

13min in, you are a filter, and the interviewed says "yeah". Well, so much for actual CRV.
He's just a psychic (yeah technically) sitting around smoking and receiving input from the actual psychic and simply committing to paper what he gets. All he seems to be doing is receiving basic training to be that endpoint. No wonder if found it strange that they keep using ciphers that mean absolutely nothing to the psychic. Makes total sense. He's just unwittingly passing it to the other third party who actually knows what it means and what it connects to.

Would be nice to see an interview where they are actual CRV practitioners in the whole. Where there is an actual working implementation and they actually know where the information comes from and when, why and how they can obtain it remotely.

------------
15min in, his analogy on precog is like someone with more experience.

----------
22min in, describes his psychic field disturbing electronics system. Typical of someone with a large influence field.

----------
25min in, he talks about how they distinguish correct from incorrect data. Like I assumed, they are using peer review process and comparisons on what is consistently the same.

----------
28min
Describes the differences between being detected when using RV vs CRV.
I am guessing the difference is because the CRV is outsourced by a professional third party. While his own RV sessions (handled by himself using his own internal ability) aren't at the same level as the third party. Thus probably one is harder to detect than the other, because the level of sophistication and applied technique is probably different.

---------

30mins probably referring to the probability axis changing by using ESP. Also seemingly refers to "updates" being necessary. Likely referring to the noticeable paradoxes (errors) of moving from one probability axis to another and how they shift the observers viewpoint in terms of probability.

(Sorta like moving horizontally in a probability axis or world lines as I think they call it these days.)

35min, they also use a monitor? Thats strange.
ET experiments always have a monitor who checks if your accessing info your not supposed to and evaluates performance.
Not really sure what a human monitor would be useful for. Even as a psychic? <puzzled?>

I've noticed some of the human RV'ers who checked me out (probably as tasked assignments) after talking about certain topics in detail; do seem have a supervisor who isn't human. They seem to monitor the connections the RVers are making. But they have them little white rooms with curved fabric (or made of something formed in curved rooms). And those human beings are taking injections of something white on a regular schedule. Their sessions seem to last about 45mins max. The RV'ers background details are also missing as if their personality is a clean slate. No personal history.

As soon as you try reading them back to gather details, the Supervisor (ET) who monitors them from a separate area interrupts the RV'er and cuts off the connection. Which seems like a completely different implementation than the CRV being described.

------------

39mins, talks about remote influencing. Seems to know about the subject first hand. Not surprising considering his influence field is large enough to disrupt electronics.

-----------
54min
I think he possibly mistakes the range issue on certain modes for ET. That he noticed limitations on certain implementations is worth an award by itself. Good job in either case.

Very interesting critique Fore.

Being that this is a relatively new subject for me, I'm not qualified to assess Buchanan's abilities but it's fascinating nonetheless.

At some point in the future I'm going to give RV a try.

Can't wait around for TPTB to disclose so I'll see if I can find something on my own.