Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Major Donald Keyhoe interview with Mike Wallace in 1958

  1. #1

    Major Donald Keyhoe interview with Mike Wallace in 1958

    Someone shared a link with me for this video and thought I'd pass it along.

    Major Donald Keyhoe interview with Mike Wallace in 1958


  2. #2
    Senior Member M-Albion-3D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Malibu, California
    Posts
    404
    Wow...intense! They don't do interviews like that anymore.
    "The more you look, the more you see...the more you see, the more you know"
    - M.Scott

  3. #3
    The man was a legend. Great spot Casper.
    The best account which describes the background and all the debunkery is in
    It Never Happened, Volume 1: U.S. Air Force UFO Cover-up Revealed Paperback – May 1, 2017
    by David D. Schindele
    Schindele reasearch into the USAF mishandling or coverup and how it all unfolded is in there.
    It's just as Keyhoe said the first airforce investigation told them the phenomenon was real and there was something in it. It started out with the brightest and best scientists working on it but they realised that they kept coming to the same conclusion so employed debunkers, or the most opinionated who would dismiss the evidence whatever it was.
    Tragic we could have been told then.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Longeyes View Post
    The man was a legend.

    It's just as Keyhoe said the first airforce investigation told them the phenomenon was real and there was something in it. It started out with the brightest and best scientists working on it but they realized that they kept coming to the same conclusion so employed debunkers, or the most opinionated who would dismiss the evidence whatever it was.
    Tragic we could have been told then.
    You're right, we should've been told back in the 1940s and 1950s.

    Quote Originally Posted by M-Albion-3D View Post
    Wow...intense! They don't do interviews like that anymore.
    It was a great interview... We keep hearing people claiming to have new information, when that info has been around for decades. It is one thing to claim they have new sources that confirm something or make reference to it, but the original source should be notated... It bothers me when credit is due to someone from the early days of struggling for Disclosure is ignored and often forgotten. For the Historical Records, these people that were earlier in the struggle for Disclosure must not be forgotten.
    Last edited by CasperParks; 02-04-2018 at 06:36 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •