Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: How can we understand ET?

  1. #1

    How can we understand ET?

    We just published a series of articles on JAR Magazine on what is needed to understand the ET presence:

    https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...is-engaging-us
    An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it.
    - Jef Mallett

    Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.
    - Charles Darwin

  2. #2
    From the introduction, reprinted with permission:

    A few weeks ago, there was an informal survey on Twitter. It revealed that the majority of ufologists taking part in the #UFOTwitter discussions were convinced that all the answers regarding the UFO phenomenon could be found by analyzing UFOs. Which is quite baffling…

    We know beyond a shadow of a doubt that some of these craft are intelligently operated. So, it would seem obvious that the focus should be on that intelligence that operates these craft. If we want to know, e.g., if they constitute a genuine threat, it is not the actual UFOs that we must pay attention to. Vehicles do not have intentions. Trying to understand the intelligent force or forces behind UFOs solely by observing UFOs, makes about as much sense as trying to understand humanity by observing cars.

    And, of course, UFOs are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to these intelligences that are engaging us. There is a whole array of different types of contact experiences, ranging from completely benevolent and beneficial to detrimentally brutal abductions. So, these would seem like a good place to start. Yet, they have been pooh-poohed for the last 70 years. To this day, most ufologists prefer to stay as far away from contact experiences as they can. And, as Mike Jamieson’s article illustrates, they have been giving the same impertinent excuses. It should be self-evident that we need to include contact experiences in our research if we want to understand the non-human intelligences we are dealing with.

    It does not stop there. We have observed, both in contact experiences and in the ways that UFOs are operated, that they challenge our current understanding of reality. John Mack famously said we may have to refine our definitions of reality if we want to truly understand what is happening. JAR Magazine dedicated a series of articles to this: Series of Articles: Redefining Reality

    Anybody who seriously studies this phenomenon inevitably must conclude that consciousness must be added to the equation, too. And that adds yet another dimension to the whole thing.

    On Facebook, a contact experiencer recently commented that the current heavy focus on UAP while ignoring the other aspects does not constitute a limited disclosure. Instead, this is a hijacking of the narrative to deliberately steer it in a direction that benefits the Military, and away from the truth. Effectively, the current focus on UAP only turns the clock back by 70 years.

    In the articles listed below, several authors from our panel explore different aspects of what was mentioned above.

    Mike Jamieson illustrates how close encounter experiences have systematically been side-lined: https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...e-center-stage

    Thomas Minderlé looks at fields of research that are relevant to understanding the extraterrestrial presence: https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...ers-of-ufology

    Giorgio Piacenza explains why contact experiences are essential to understand the NHI that is interacting with us: https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...ct-experiences

    Bill Konkolesky looks at the significance of Abductions in the Age of UAP: https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...the-age-of-uap

    Rebecca Hardcastle Wright explains why consciousness is integral in understanding the Visitors: https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...nscious-humans
    An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it.
    - Jef Mallett

    Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.
    - Charles Darwin

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Garuda View Post
    From the introduction, reprinted with permission:

    A few weeks ago, there was an informal survey on Twitter. It revealed that the majority of ufologists taking part in the #UFOTwitter discussions were convinced that all the answers regarding the UFO phenomenon could be found by analyzing UFOs. Which is quite baffling…

    We know beyond a shadow of a doubt that some of these craft are intelligently operated. So, it would seem obvious that the focus should be on that intelligence that operates these craft. If we want to know, e.g., if they constitute a genuine threat, it is not the actual UFOs that we must pay attention to. Vehicles do not have intentions. Trying to understand the intelligent force or forces behind UFOs solely by observing UFOs, makes about as much sense as trying to understand humanity by observing cars.

    And, of course, UFOs are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to these intelligences that are engaging us. There is a whole array of different types of contact experiences, ranging from completely benevolent and beneficial to detrimentally brutal abductions. So, these would seem like a good place to start. Yet, they have been pooh-poohed for the last 70 years. To this day, most ufologists prefer to stay as far away from contact experiences as they can. And, as Mike Jamieson’s article illustrates, they have been giving the same impertinent excuses. It should be self-evident that we need to include contact experiences in our research if we want to understand the non-human intelligences we are dealing with.

    It does not stop there. We have observed, both in contact experiences and in the ways that UFOs are operated, that they challenge our current understanding of reality. John Mack famously said we may have to refine our definitions of reality if we want to truly understand what is happening. JAR Magazine dedicated a series of articles to this: Series of Articles: Redefining Reality

    Anybody who seriously studies this phenomenon inevitably must conclude that consciousness must be added to the equation, too. And that adds yet another dimension to the whole thing.

    On Facebook, a contact experiencer recently commented that the current heavy focus on UAP while ignoring the other aspects does not constitute a limited disclosure. Instead, this is a hijacking of the narrative to deliberately steer it in a direction that benefits the Military, and away from the truth. Effectively, the current focus on UAP only turns the clock back by 70 years.

    In the articles listed below, several authors from our panel explore different aspects of what was mentioned above.

    Mike Jamieson illustrates how close encounter experiences have systematically been side-lined: https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...e-center-stage

    Thomas Minderlé looks at fields of research that are relevant to understanding the extraterrestrial presence: https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...ers-of-ufology

    Giorgio Piacenza explains why contact experiences are essential to understand the NHI that is interacting with us: https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...ct-experiences

    Bill Konkolesky looks at the significance of Abductions in the Age of UAP: https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...the-age-of-uap

    Rebecca Hardcastle Wright explains why consciousness is integral in understanding the Visitors: https://www.jar-magazine.com/ask-the...nscious-humans
    Garuda, thanks for posting...

    I agree...

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by CasperParks View Post
    Garuda, thanks for posting...

    I agree...
    Thanks...

    Things are going the wrong way.
    An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it.
    - Jef Mallett

    Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.
    - Charles Darwin

  5. #5
    Basically, the real problem is that the people who should be taking this seriously and reporting on it as such are of a mind that they don't want it to be true. When confronted by that simple fact, the behaviour of the vast majority of people regarding the topic makes perfect sense.

    Let me scope it this way, if they have to believe in aliens and supernatural powers, then they must also confront the reckoning that they are likely wrong on other fronts. Some of these lead to rather difficult topics, like the fact they may need to change themselves and what they do, or face very real consequences. Instead, they prefer to look at the Ostrich, and follow its example until the bitter end, as they do not want to address the problem in front of them, even to save themselves.

    I, unfortunately, have to deal with people who would rather destroy themselves and all around them, instead of addressing fixable problems before it is too late. In such situations, I have learned I am always wrong to attempt to discuss it so it may be addressed and fixed, and always wrong for not sorting them out when it is too late. Basically, a proper impossible situation they are creating for themselves, and stopping me from fixing; it is wrong for me to fix another's problem.
    In that light, the actual insanity of the greater populace of ignoring what is in plan sight is readily apparent.

  6. #6

    Lightbulb

    I think it is a paradigm problem. Even when you study the occupants of the UAP's, it always going to turn into a notion of preset paradigms which are inherently incorrect in their pre-assumptions.



    What we pre-assume about who or what the occupants effectively are and "this paradigm" we all live our lives in...well it locks you into a set of conclusions.

    Just like a healthy mind should be internally consistent. Humanity and it's understandings should be consistent with all aspects of the reality they reside in.

    Humanity as a whole is divorced from it's long prior history (in terms of paradigms). A recent break, that resulted in the current active paradigm of thinking and rather recently established notions. If I say it in a simpler way, humanity changed it's glasses from blue tinted ones to rose colored ones. Throwing away old notions and relegating thousands of years of valid observations to a filing cabinet in some dark corner.

    The people in the UAP's are actively promulgating the modern paradigm of thinking among humanity (a rather deep misunderstanding) and will eventually play with our misunderstandings about who they are and where they come from. Reframing the current paradigm into a new (more beneficial to them) context.

    Humanity is living in it's own "Great Delusion". Its a delusion that spans the globe and seems real and absolutely certain...but ultimately is not real.



    The "ET" will eventually exploit this wide scale delusion (a mighty exploit if I ever saw one!) and ultimately conn humanity into changing the relationship dynamic between them and us.

    One day the deluded among humanity will assume we came from them because they say so. They will even have specimens ready to make us confirm it. No doubt once this "identity change" gains acceptance, humanity will adopt a new doctored relationship.

    Not too different from how "ET" try to change the relationship dynamic in some abduction cases. Mentally manipulating people into thinking they were long lost relatives, family, or from a reincarnation cycle.

    People act differently, if you are able to assume a false identity.

    (Great Delusion = Great Deception)
    Last edited by Fore; 08-02-2021 at 01:14 AM.
    For every action, there is a corresponding over-reaction. -- Anonymous

  7. #7
    The Guardian has a nice article discussing the Elephant in the room, that of the experiences of those contacted and why they should be taken more seriously: https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ore-seriously-
    As time goes on, I suspect some of the stuff coming out is going to blow up in the face of a lot of people; those who deny and ridicule, as well as bring the entire profession of psychology into disrepute as an enabler of abuse and discounter of reality (the hellstorm awaiting those people will be quite amazing.)

    Quite notable this is even being discussed reasonably in a newspaper.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •