Lord Blackmore Exposes Geithner-Greenspan "federal Reserve Cabal"

[Doc]

From Robert Morningstar:

"In a speech before the House of Lords on February 15, 2012, Lord Blackmore exposed the operations of a Geithner-Greenspan Federal Reserve Bank "Cabal" in gold and bond trading.

Lord Blackmore stated that Geithner and Greenspan co-signed fraudulent Fed Bank-IMF documents used in bond trading and money laundering. Working with a Saudi Arabian middle man, Yohannis Riyadi, "the world's richest man," to shuffle bonds through MTN network banks.

Mr. Riyadi now claims: "They have stolen all my money."

"All my money" comes to about 37 trillion dollars.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/81988787/T...James2-16-2012

If verified, this makes Geithner and Greenspan the biggest crooks of all time.

Lord Blackmore claimed to be holding "not a copy, but an original contract" as he read from it."

M*

[Chris]

Can you say "New World Order"?

[newyorklily]

Gee, those guys make Bernie Madoff look like a small time con-artist.

[Doc]

I don't remember a time pror to this when Big Money was so blatant about their activities. It is all their game to play and no one is even trying to rein them in. The Government for all of its rhetoric is in bed with these guys.

[Longeyes]

Thought I'd post it in full WTF is going on?

Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative) 16 February 2012 5.20pm

My Lords, I hope the minute that that has taken has not come off my time. I do not wish noble Lords to get too encouraged when I start with my conclusions but I will not sit down when I have made them. I will then give the evidence to support them and, I hope, present the reasons why I want support for an official inquiry into the mischief I shall unfold this afternoon. I have been engaged in pursuit of this issue for nearly two years and I am no further forward in getting to the truth.

There are three possible conclusions which may come from it. First, there may have been a massive piece of money-laundering committed by a major Government who should know better. Effectively, it undermined the integrity of a British bank, the Royal Bank of Scotland, in doing so. The second possibility is that a major American department has an agency which has gone rogue on it because it has been wound up and has created a structure out of which it is seeking to get at least €50 billion as a pay-off. The third possibility is that this is an extraordinarily elaborate fraud, which has not been carried out, but which has been prepared to provide a threat to one Government or more if they do not make a pay-off. These three possibilities need an urgent review.

In April and May 2009, the situation started with the alleged transfer of $5 trillion to HSBC in the United Kingdom. Seven days later, another $5 trillion came to HSBC and three weeks later another $5 trillion. A total of $15 trillion is alleged to have been passed into the hands of HSBC for onward transit to the Royal Bank of Scotland. We need to look to where this came from and the history of this money. I have been trying to sort out the sequence by which this money has been created and where it has come from for a long time.

It starts off apparently as the property of Yohannes Riyadi, who has some claims to be considered the richest man in the world. He would be if all the money that was owed to him was paid but I have seen some accounts of his showing that he owns $36 trillion in a bank. It is a ridiculous sum of money. However, $36 trillion would be consistent with the dynasty from which he comes and the fact that it had been effectively the emperors of Indo-China in times gone by. A lot of that money has been taken away from him, with his consent, by the American Treasury over the years for the specific purpose of helping to support the dollar.

Mr Riyadi has sent me a remarkable document dated February 2006 in which the American Government have called him to a meeting with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which is neither the Federal Reserve nor a bank. It is a bit like "Celebrity Big Brother". It has three names to describe it and none of them is true. This astonishing document purports to have been a meeting, which was witnessed by Mr Alan Greenspan, who signed for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of which he was chairman, as well as chairman of the real Federal Reserve in Washington. It is signed by Mr Timothy Geithner as a witness on behalf of the International Monetary Fund. The IMF sent two witnesses, the other being Mr Yusuke Horiguchi. These gentlemen have signed as witnesses to the effect that this deal is a proper deal. There are a lot of other signatures on the document. I do not have a photocopy; I have an original version of the contract.

Under the contract, the American Treasury has apparently got the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to offer to buy out the bonds issued to Mr Riyadi to replace the cash which has been taken from him over the previous 10 years. It is giving him $500 million as a cash payment to buy out worthless bonds. That is all in the agreement and it is very remarkable. Establishing whether I have a correct piece of paper is just two phone calls away-one to Mr Geithner and one to Mr Greenspan, both of whom still prosper and live. They could easily confirm whether they signed it. Mr Riyadi, by passing these bonds over, has also put at the disposal of the US Treasury the entire asset backing which he was alleged to have for the $15 trillion. I have a letter from the Bank of Indonesia which says that the whole thing was a pack of lies. He did not have the 750,000 tonnes of gold which was supposed to be backing it; he had only 700 tonnes. This is a piece of complete fabrication.

Finally, I have a letter from Mr Riyadi himself, who tells me that he was put up to do this, that none of it is true, and that he has been robbed of all his money. I am quite prepared to recognise that one of the possibilities is that Mr Riyadi is himself putting this together as a forgery in order to try to win some recovery. But it gets more complicated than that because each of the $5 trillion payments that came in has been acknowledged and receipted by senior executives at HSBC and again receipted by senior executives at the Royal Bank of Scotland. I have a set of receipts for all of this money. Why would any bank want to file $5 trillion-worth-$15 trillion in total-of receipts if the money did not exist? The money was first said to have come from the Riyadi account to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and from there it was passed to JP MorganChase in New York for onward transit to London. The means of sending it was a SWIFT note which, if it was genuine, ought to have been registered with the Bank of England.

When this came about, I took it to my noble friend Lord Strathclyde and asked what we should do with it. He said, "Give it to Lord Sassoon. He is the Treasury". So I did, and my noble friend Lord Sassoon looked at it and said immediately, "This is rubbish. It is far too much money. It would stick out like a sore thumb and you cannot see it in the Royal Bank of Scotland accounts". He went on to say, "The gold backing it is ridiculous. Only 1,507 tonnes of gold has been mined in the history of the world, so you cannot have 750,000 tonnes". That is true. The third thing he said was, "It is a scam", and I agree with him. The problem is that at that point we stopped looking, but we should have asked what the scam was instead of just nodding it off.

We have never resolved it. Today, I have this quite frightening piece of paper, which is my justification for bringing it into this meeting. It is available on the internet and I am astonished that it has not already been unearthed by the Treasury because every alarm bell in the land should be ringing if it has. It is from the general audit office of the Federal Reserve in Washington-the real Federal Reserve-and its audit review to the end of July 2010 on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. It has on it some 20 banks listed to which $16.115 trillion is outstanding in loans. That is the sore thumb that was being looked for by my noble friend Lord Sassoon. But more particularly there are two other interesting things. The first is that Barclays Bank has $868 billion of loan, and the Royal Bank of Scotland has $541 billion, in which case one has to ask a question, because they could have earned back in three weeks their entire indebtedness and could pay off the taxpayers of Britain. Why have they not done so and could we please ask them to put a cheque in the post tonight for the whole $46 billion?

The next thing that is wrong with it is that every bank on this list, without exception, is an MTN-registered bank, which means that they are registered to use medium-term notes to move funds between themselves with an agreed profit-share formula, in which case these banks are investing this money and, most extraordinarily, not a penny of interest does the Federal Bank of New York want paid on that vast amount, $16 trillion. Anyone who knows what the IMF rules are will immediately smell a rat. The IMF has very strict rules for validating dodgy money. There are two ways of doing it. You either pass it through a major central bank like the Bank of England, which apparently refused to touch this, or you put it through an MTN-trading bank, which is then able to use the funds on the overnight European MTN trading market where they can earn between 1 per cent and 2.5 per cent profit per night. The compound interest on that sum is huge. If it is genuine, a vast profit is being made on this money somewhere.

I believe that this is now such an important issue that I have put everything that I have got on the subject on to a 104-megabyte memory thumb. I want the Government to take it all, put it to some suitable investigative bureau and find out the truth of what is going on here, because something is very seriously wrong. Either we have a huge amount of tax uncollected on profits made or we have a vast amount of money festering away in the European banking system which is not real money, in which case we need to take it back. I ask for an investigation and for noble Lords to support my plea.

[Longeyes]

http://pppkingdom.wordpress.com/2011...sbc-london-bg/

Some HSBC documetation here and more on the deal.

[Longeyes]

Or is it just a scam one mentioned here mentions his name Yohannes Riyadi

http://www.ny.frb.org/banking/frscams.html

[Longeyes]

Found this no idea if this holds together...

In this thread post 24

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showt...6264959&page=2

You could be right but one wonders why in all the scams on the fed website this is the only one which they want you to contact this guy for a mickey mouse scam

Erik Rosenblatt, Senior Special Agent at the Department of Homeland Security

Who recieved an award for his part SIAC/new york (operation wirecutter)

SAIC/New York special agents and task force officers in charge of "Operation Wirecutter," an investigation that led to the dismantling of one of the largest Colombian-based money laundering organizations ever uncovered. Customs agents and prosecutors believe the organization laundered millions of drug trafficking profits over several years

US: In The Company Of Spies
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=7892



The company has had as part of its management, and on its Board of Directors, many well known ex-government personnel including Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense in the Nixon administration; William Perry, Secretary of Defense for Bill Clinton; John M. Deutch, President Clinton's CIA Director; Admiral Bobby Ray Inman who served in various capacities in the NSA and CIA for the Ford, Carter and Reagan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAIC_%28company%29

SAIC is it not notorious for getting Black Budget money? and ET technology?

[epo333]

Hut-oh...



It does indeed appear that as a result of Lord James of Blackheath’s courage in addressing the British Parliament http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL5hqvTWkYg and the work of the so-called White Hats behind the scenes, a major takedown of the corrupt worldwide financial network at the highest levels is in progress.

This is stunning. The biggest fish of all, Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner and Chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan are clearly implicated.



MASS RESIGNATIONS HAVE STARTED...

http://projectcamelotproductions.com/blog-hp.html

WOW!

[Longeyes]

Mass resignations?
There is a world wide banking crisis going on! 'course loads of people are losing their job. They all done for pretty petty sums compared to $5 trillion dollars.
This all becomes really twisted as soon as Benjamin Fulford gets mentioned, i find it hard to believe a word he said. Nothing is backed by anyone but him.
His stuff mentions was seem like thousands of trillions which is just ridiculous. There is not that much money in the world GDP is only about $53 trillion dollars (although I cannot find decent refer for this)

Money said to calculated in these designations.
Interestingly using M3 as a means of measuring the money supply is no longer used by The Fed. And 'short-term repurchase agreements' are what all the 'Riyadi' transactions seem to be.

# M0: Physical currency. A measure of the money supply which combines any liquid or cash assets held within a central bank and the amount of physical currency circulating in the economy. M0 (M-zero) is the most liquid measure of the money supply. It only includes cash or assets that could quickly be converted into currency. This measure is known as narrow money because it is the smallest measure of the money supply.[6]
# M1: M0 + demand deposits, which are checking accounts. This is used as a measurement for economists trying to quantify the amount of money in circulation. The M1 is a very liquid measure of the money supply, as it contains cash and assets that can quickly be converted to currency.[7]
# M2: M1 + small time deposits (less than $100,000), savings deposits, and non-institutional money-market funds. M2 is a broader classification of money than M1. Economists use M2 when looking to quantify the amount of money in circulation and trying to explain different economic monetary conditions.[8] M2 is key economic indicator used to forecast inflation.[9]
# M3: M2 + all large time deposits, institutional money-market funds, short-term repurchase agreements, along with other larger liquid assets. The broadest measure of money; it is used by economists to estimate the entire supply of money within an economy

One source i found said M3 was only $15 trillion