The video "analysis" that concludes it is nothing more that a flying insect actually shows nothing at all. The first few "dots" he circles in red to try and show the "insect" flying up from knee level are actually items in the background that are there in every frame. So, he is circling rocks, etc to try and show an insect?
Bob Schaeffer is a modern day Phillip Klass.
So it is in no way possible that the "ufo" are insects in your opinion?
I think it is certainly possible
check this
http://blog.ufo-blog.com/2012/03/leslie-kean-chile-ufo-videos-update.html?spref=fb
Kean has been caught covering up facts again
Or maybe creating someOriginally Posted by murmur
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
Sherlock Holmes
What I stated is that the video purporting to prove that it was an insect does not prove anything at all. In fact, the person who did so has deliberately misled people in to thinking that every object circled in his video is his "insect", when that is obviously not the case.
I will check out the link you have posted though.
OK, I've read Naisbitt's blog regarding who said what during this process. It appears as though the experts have ruled out everything except for insects (which is as Naisbitt states is one of his favorite explanations for anomalous aerial objects) with the only reason that insects have not been ruled out is that Berea did not respond to his specific question about it. Berea did originally indicate though that he was looking for insects as a probable cause and then goes on to state that the typical signature attributed to birds and insects could be ruled out (I am paraphrasing here).
As to Kean's assertions on slide #18 - her quote attributed to Berea does appear to be inaccurate given Berea's later clarification of what he meant in an email exchange with Naisbitt. However, there do not appear to be any other inaccuracies in her blog post.
That being said, it seems that every expert brought in to examine the various videos has clearly stated that it can not be identified, which kinda flies in the face of the point of Naisbitt's blog post (pun intended!0
I don't think it is possible to prove one way or the other.
But I do think it is possible the "ufo" is/are insects.....and probable.
It fits.
How do insects fit when there are seven separate videos showing the same object and the experts studying them do not see any of the blurring that should occur at the edges of the object if it indeed was an insect or a bird?
The fact is that insects do not fit at all.
Aren't the other video's from the same basic location?
They were all standing together
And it's flight characteristics looks like a bug....does it not?
http://i786.photobucket.com/albums/y...m_bug_edit.gif
No, they were not. In fact, one of the videos was taken from an adjoining facility to the airfield. Not to mention that the videos follow the jets from one horizon to the other and yet the object remains in frame for the whole 180 degree shot.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote