PDA

View Full Version : Mars Forest Canopies: Hidden Truth Report



Doc
03-18-2012, 02:06 PM
From Filer's Files #11-2012:



Mars Forest Canopies
Revealed in “The Hidden Truth” Report #188
http://www.listrocket.com/ktml2/user/1241_M837Hca3MN/images/uploads/1241_oamuKCK38ozAhY8MKyt3_files/image019.jpg
"Joseph P. Skipper writes about some evidence on Mars in his book “Hidden Truth", “ I'm going to do the best I can to make sure we're all on the same page with this type of forest top canopy evidence because this evidence is a matter of visually joined patterns of massed individual objects. So I'm starting off with a couple of Earth based conventional tree forest canopy visual examples demonstrating closer aerial views as opposed to the more distant satellite views to make sure we're all familiar with what forest canopies look like. Then further down we'll move into the Mars more distant evidence for this report.

DK Canada: Rainforest - Thomas Marent (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://cn.dk.com/static/cs/cn/11/nf/features/rainforest/gallery15.html&lid=74958&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356)

The above first image demonstrates a forest scene here on [COLOR=navy]Earth with a river running through it. Rare on Earth due to the manipulations of man regarding trees as a useable resource, this is an old growth forest in the Amazon (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://www.amazon.com/&lid=74959&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356) basin. As an old growth forest, note how the forest canopy stretches unbroken for so many miles off into the distance. If left alone for long decades or even centuries with the right conditions, this is what tree forests do. They engulf and dominate everything they can get a foothold on or in. Note that, except for the river, no geological terrain features are visible in this scene for mile after mile as all of the geological terrain has been covered over by the plant life (tree) growth. Even the shore of the river is not visible as the trees competing for space in the sunlight extend out hanging over the river's banks.

Now this is a closer oblique angle aerial view and not a distant satellite straight down view. That means that we can see the individual tree objects better and do a little differentiating as to one tree object from another. If we were to progressively draw the scene back to a more distant satellite straight down view, the evidence would of course get progressively smaller and smaller with less and less individual object detail until finally it would look more like a flattened carpet rather than a forest. That is the visual impact of size scale on evidence of this type.

In such distant straight down satellite views, only the predominantly green color evidence would really tip us off that we were looking at forest and life. Trees and plants produce their own food. Simplistically they absorb nutrients and water from the ground and CO2 from the air and convert it via sunlight and photosynthesis into chlorophyll producing the green color in their limbs and leaves and exhale oxygen into the atmosphere that animal life here on Earth, including us, are so dependent upon.

http://www.listrocket.com/ktml2/user/1241_M837Hca3MN/images/uploads/1241_oamuKCK38ozAhY8MKyt3_files/image015.jpg
Of course the Mars black and white satellite imaging released to us conveniently does not contain this color information. If it did, recognition of forests would be instant and no doubt why it isn't included. Likewise the distances involved with satellite images and their straight down view tends to merge forest detail into a blurry joined mass. Just in case that isn't convenient enough for secrecy agenda goals because the great size of some objects resist this effect, messing with the image resolution to further degrade detail into a blurry mess is an additional bonus.


http://www.dendronautics.org/page2.htm (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://www.dendronautics.org/page2.htm&lid=74960&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356)

The above 2nd image is another example of an aerial Earth Amazonia forest unbroken canopy view.
Note again that no ground geology is visible here at all. The trees engulf and cover everything. Again, this is typical of old growth tree forests that over long periods of time pack every bit of the available finite space in great density as they compete with each other for sunlight essential to their photosynthesis process. Also, over long periods of time, certain types of trees tend to dominate more successfully and the forest becomes more and more homogenous with less and less variety.

You'll note that I have placed two small insets into the upper right corner of the images. The top inset is the whole image desaturated of color and with a reduction in size to just 20% of the original color image to sort of mimic or simulate how the distancing technique impacts detail. The second inset down below the top one is again the whole image desaturated of color, shown on 20% of its original size, and now with just one layer of blur also added. Note how the blur further reduces the detail while yet maintaining the more gross features. This is just one of a number of ways that obfuscation is done in the satellite science data. (continued)

Doc
03-18-2012, 02:07 PM
More Mars Forest Canopies:

Verify at: http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/m07_m12/images/M07/M0703768.html (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/m07_m12/images/M07/M0703768.html&lid=74961&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356)
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/m07037/m0703768.html (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/m07037/m0703768.html&lid=74962&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356)


"Unfortunately, we of course have no closer oblique aerial color views of the Mars landscape that might reveal more detail. So we have to be get by with the distant mostly straight down satellite views provided.

http://www.listrocket.com/ktml2/user/1241_M837Hca3MN/images/uploads/1241_oamuKCK38ozAhY8MKyt3_files/image017.jpg This image is a M07-03768 satellite view from the MGS MOC data that has a little sharpening work to bring out the smaller detail.


It demonstrates a super dense tree forest top canopy engulfing some gently rolling hills and undulations in the terrain. We are fortunate here that, despite the distant view merging detail; this is a little more mixed variety forest with some of the trees being taller and larger than their neighbors. This creates some unevenness and irregularities in canopy top surface similar to the Earth based images and that helps with identification.

Yes this evidence with its look of conventional trees packed in super high density is on Mars. It should be fairly obvious here that we are not looking at geological terrain but at old growth forest and likely conventional trees by its look engulfing and covering the geological terrain. Further, this site is in the South Polar Region where instrument testing in the past has told us that it gets super freezing cold at –180 F to –225 F. Temperatures like that can crack steel and it is why one does not see trees here on Earth in the Polar Regions. The ice crystals form in organic cell's moisture enlarging and destroying the cells with death following.


So either the above trees are incredibly severe cold adapted or someone is pulling our collective leg about the Mars temperatures. That question might remain unanswered except for the presence of multiple forest surrounded lakes of liquid water as presented in my book just released and that tells the real tale. It tells us that the Mars atmospheric temperature, including in the Polar Regions, is much milder and friendlier to life as we know it than we have been led to believe over these last decades and generations have grown up with a falsehood as an essential part of their educational process.

Should anyone try to avoid responsibility for this miserable extremely cold temperature fallacy by trying to argue that there have been recent warming trends that have changed things since the earliest test results, look again at that above forest. This is not growth just a few decades old. It is very old growth and it likely took centuries to gain this kind of complete domination of this terrain so successfully. This tells us that the Mars environment is not only favorable to this growth; the environment has been stable and consistently favorable for a very long time.


This situation is typical of most of the forest growth on Mars. It is aggressive. A species tends to dominate a given area covering vast expanses. Consequently, when our satellite camera passing overhead takes a picture of the Mars surface in the form of a strip much longer than it is wide, such strips tend to involve only sections of the evidence and rarely beginning or ending boundaries. It's like taking a picture of a mid area section of carpet showing no boundary edges.

This impacts what we would consider normal size evidence (by our Earth standards) negatively visually merging it together and this is made worse by obfuscation treatments furthering this impact. On the other hand, Mars with its lower gravity is a place where living things often get very big and even gigantic. The larger the size of some of the individual objects, the more they resist being obscured by standard obfuscation treatments and so once in a rare while evidence is not sufficiently dealt with by the obfuscation treatments. That is partially the situation with the following Mars forest growth evidence. The book can be ordered online at this LINK (http://www.listrocket.com/public/link.php?url=https://www.shopmarsanomalyresearch.com/&lid=74963&uid=2816118&sid=27815&mid=24356) via your credit card through PayPal. Thanks to Joseph Skipper"

krazyken
06-22-2013, 04:01 PM
Skipper is my hero! He inspired my research!


KK