Originally Posted by
Fore
I tried looking at the film but it is behind a paywall. (I think?)
I am curious though as to how they achieved it? Anyone know if the film gives any hints?
The thing that boggles my mind is what method they used as an imaging process?
Normally, it's "psychic" output and interference with a back end interpreter to tie and map the sensation back into physical sensation. So I was left intrigued and wondering how they achieved the ?same results? without so many of the necessary components? (I was wondering if they have a more efficient method or something?)
But in the pictures I noticed that they have a digital camera right up close to a blind folded womans face. So I know if they used an ET version that they couldn't have electronics that up close otherwise they'd have to replace the camera every session.
So I am curious, because in the back of my mind I am doing mental kung fu, to figure out how they achieve such (presumably) low output performance? They describe the right performance characteristics but none of the draw backs that I can see.
Can someone clue me in?