Looks like the Disclosure battle coming out in the open . . .
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/techn...edgdhp&pc=U531This might sound like progress from a Department that has spent much of the Post-Second World War period saying UFOs are fiction. Unfortunately, it's anything but that.
In reality, this is a deliberate and calculated effort to undermine bipartisan legislation moving through Congress. That legislation centers on Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's amendment to the 2022 Defense Act.
It looks indeed like this is an attempt to torpedo the initiative by Congress.
The Pentagon prefers to be the one in charge.
On Twitter, Elizondo and others are urging people to contact their congresspeople to push through Gillibrand's amendment.
Robert Salas on the other hand, is not even pleased with Gillibrand's initiative saying it leaves too much room for a continued cover-up.
An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it.
- Jef Mallett
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.
- Charles Darwin
I'm not one to read too deeply into symbology, but this drew my eye.
AOIMSG has an anagram IMAGOS
IMAGOS in psychology is an idealised image of a person, usually a parent, that children hold through into adulthood. Is that like a statement about how people view the UFO phenomenon? Are they trying to say that people have an unrealistic view of the field and need to grow up and understand it is more complicated?
It's also an anagram of AMIGOS...Originally Posted by Shere Khaan
An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it.
- Jef Mallett
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge.
- Charles Darwin
Yep here's Lue's Tweets in Full doesn't sound like this is anything but the USDI trying to throw a spanner in the works and maintain control:
1. Important update: Before anyone gets too excited about the recent Pentagon announcement of a new UAP group, please consider the following:
A. USDI is precisely the same organization that has underplayed and tried to kill the UAP effort for years.
2B. USDI is an oversight organization and non-operational.
C. Nowhere is there a requirement to provide unclassified findings to Congress, or work with our international partners.
3. Given that elements still exist in the Pentagon who are actively underplaying the significance of this topic, this is akin to giving an alcoholic the key and control to the liquor cabinet.
4. If you want to maintain UAP/UFO secrecy, this is exactly how to do it.
5. This is a direct and blatant attempt to circumvent and undermine the Senate, @SenGillibrand,@SenRubioPress, @RepRubenGallego, @MartinHeinrich,@RepTimBurchett and others.
Please, please, please contact your representatives and let them know this is unacceptable and not in the best interest of the American people. The USDI is the one single office that has continuously lied about this topic and persecuted whistleblowers.
U.S. Senate blocks annual defense bill amid Republican objections
By Patricia Zengerle and Richard Cowan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Senate blocked the National Defense Authorization Act on Monday amid objections from Republicans and some liberal Democrats, although lawmakers will keep working on the massive annual defense policy bill, which has become law for 60 straight years.
The vote was 45-51, meaning the measure could not get the 60 "yes" votes needed to advance toward passage in the 100-member Senate.
The NDAA, which normally passes with strong bipartisan support, is closely watched by a broad swath of industry and other interests as it determines everything from how many ships are bought to pay increases for soldiers and how to address geopolitical threats.
This year's legislation authorizes some $770 billion in Pentagon spending, which is one reason some Democrats objected, saying the military budget should not be so large when the country is not adequately addressing issues such as healthcare, education and climate change.
Lawmakers take pride in the NDAA's having become law every year since 1961, saying it reflects their support for the military. Because it is one of the only major bills to become law annually, it is used as a vehicle for legislation on issues from competition with China to cyber policy.
Republicans said they voted no because Democrats, who thinly control the Senate, did not allow enough votes on amendments, including one that would have imposed mandatory sanctions over Nord Stream 2, a Russian-backed natural gas pipeline that opponents believe would be harmful to U.S. allies in Europe.
Senator Jim Inhofe, ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said the measure would eventually pass. "I'm still very supportive of this bill and hope we will pass it soon," Inhofe said.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called the vote "inexplicable and outrageous" and accused Republicans of voting against the troops. "Just because a few Republicans didn't get every single concession they insisted on they are halting the process," he said.
(epo333 comment)
. . . We who have been following the National Defense Authorization Act, and know of a recent amendment, might find it hard to believe it fails to pass at this time, after 60 years of passing each year . . . Amazing . . .
Reply With Quote
